Advertisement
Civilization Fanatics' Center  

Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Civilization Fanatics' Forums > OUR ARCHIVES > List of Archived Forums > Civilization III Archives > Civ3 - Multi-site Demo Game: High Council

Notices

View Poll Results: Should we sign the Gamecatcher Non-Agression Pact as outlined below?
YES 4 36.36%
NO 7 63.64%
Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 28, 2003, 11:30 PM   #1
Octavian X
is not a pipe.
 
Octavian X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: deceiving people with images
Posts: 5,428
Do we sign the GC NAP?

Discussion has died down, so we should poll this now. Discussion occured here.

This poll will close in one day.

Question: Do we sign the below agreement?
Quote:
In the interests of peace and future cooperation, to ensure our security and friendship, The Empire of the Fanatikese and The Gamecatcher Alliance hereby agree to the following:

There shall be no war or conflict between us. Our units shall not attack each other. Nor shall our units interfere with the travel and movement of each other outside of these borders. This shall be considered a Non-Aggression Pact.

Fanatikese units, logically, will be restricted from moving east of Balance of Power. Gamecatcher is allowed to use one warrior for the purpose of exploration west of Balance of Power. That warrior may not leave a 5 tile radius of Balance of Power.

This agreement shall last 20 turns after it is ratified by both parties. This agreement shall be open for renegotiation after 15 turns have passed.
Please vote YES or NO.

NOTICE: In the interest of keeping this poll fair, I ask that there be NO discussion in this thread. Please post comments here. Thank you.

Last edited by Octavian X; Mar 28, 2003 at 11:36 PM.
Octavian X is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2003, 12:59 AM   #2
Octavian X
is not a pipe.
 
Octavian X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: deceiving people with images
Posts: 5,428
Then, it is decided. We shall REJECT a non-agression pact with the Gamecatcher Alliance. I will send the Gamecatcher ambassador notice of rejection now.
Octavian X is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2003, 07:03 AM   #3
Goonie
Lonely End of the Rink
 
Goonie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kingston
Posts: 3,312
Excuse me Octavian, but this continued actions by you to do my job is getting quite irritating. I was elected to handle these types of issues, and you were were elected to handle the saves.

Thank you.
Goonie is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Go Back Civilization Fanatics' Forums > OUR ARCHIVES > List of Archived Forums > Civilization III Archives > Civ3 - Multi-site Demo Game: High Council > Do we sign the GC NAP?

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apolytonian NAP Renewal Octavian X Civ3 - Multi-site Demo Game: High Council 4 Sep 15, 2003 11:22 PM
Renew the Apolytonian NAP? Octavian X Civ3 - Multi-site Demo Game: High Council 6 Jul 13, 2003 09:38 PM
NAP with Apolyton Goonie Civ3 - Multi-site Demo Game: High Council 14 May 10, 2003 06:10 PM


Advertisement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is copyright © Civilization Fanatics' Center.
Support CFC: Amazon.com | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon CA | Amazon FR