I have my first game on Monarch level running and my feeling is that it goes neither very badly nor particularly well. I'm somewhere in mid game (Replacable Parts in tech tree) and couldn't say for sure if I will win or lose. Both is still possible and the game is definitely a challenge for me so that I intend to stay on Monarch level for some more games before I'll try a more difficult level.
During the game I have noticed that I'm still struggling in the early game when it comes to timing important decisions like "When do I build my second and third city" (I tend to be late, I believe) and "When do I research this or that tech", but I could also improve in "micro decisions" like "When do I whip", "When and for what do I chop", "Which building/unit do I really need now" or "Which improvements do my workers need to build now" (my current approach is best described as "chaotic"). Other things that are often not clear to me involve diplomacy and tech trading and I don't have a real grasp of timing, preparing and executing a war (I tend to prepare too long, sometimes until the enemy has the proper defenders that I exactly didn't want to face). City specialization is another thing that I tend to overlook a bit. (My cities are often mediocre (except capital maybe) because they are good and bad in everything, instead of being very good in one thing and very bad in another...)
As said, in my current game it works "somehow" but my feeling is that it's more luck than a strategic outcome. (For example, I believe, one early war declaration of a strong neighbour had killed me because I wasn't in good shape for a long early period.)
Long story short: I wanted to ask if I can start a new game (parallel, I'll continue with my current game alone) with your occasional support for especially the early steps. I could upload screen shots and saved games every now and then. I have read several times here that you prefer and that it's easier for you to attend a game from the beginning instead of supporting a game that is already running for a longer time and where important things are possibly already messed up due to bad early play.
If so, what leader would you recommend for such a "game improvement session" that is a bit beyond the basics but not much? I would prefer to select a new one that I didn't play in my last games, just for the change (i.e. not Willem, Ghengis, Huayna, Hatshepsut or Darius). If you say however one of those is best suited to improve on the game I'll start with him/her once more.
During the game I have noticed that I'm still struggling in the early game when it comes to timing important decisions like "When do I build my second and third city" (I tend to be late, I believe) and "When do I research this or that tech", but I could also improve in "micro decisions" like "When do I whip", "When and for what do I chop", "Which building/unit do I really need now" or "Which improvements do my workers need to build now" (my current approach is best described as "chaotic"). Other things that are often not clear to me involve diplomacy and tech trading and I don't have a real grasp of timing, preparing and executing a war (I tend to prepare too long, sometimes until the enemy has the proper defenders that I exactly didn't want to face). City specialization is another thing that I tend to overlook a bit. (My cities are often mediocre (except capital maybe) because they are good and bad in everything, instead of being very good in one thing and very bad in another...)
As said, in my current game it works "somehow" but my feeling is that it's more luck than a strategic outcome. (For example, I believe, one early war declaration of a strong neighbour had killed me because I wasn't in good shape for a long early period.)
Long story short: I wanted to ask if I can start a new game (parallel, I'll continue with my current game alone) with your occasional support for especially the early steps. I could upload screen shots and saved games every now and then. I have read several times here that you prefer and that it's easier for you to attend a game from the beginning instead of supporting a game that is already running for a longer time and where important things are possibly already messed up due to bad early play.
If so, what leader would you recommend for such a "game improvement session" that is a bit beyond the basics but not much? I would prefer to select a new one that I didn't play in my last games, just for the change (i.e. not Willem, Ghengis, Huayna, Hatshepsut or Darius). If you say however one of those is best suited to improve on the game I'll start with him/her once more.