Advertisement
Civilization Fanatics' Center  

Welcome to Civilization Fanatics' Center.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to our site features. By joining our free community, you will be able to participate in the discussions, search the forum, send private messages, vote in polls, upload your own screenshots to the gallery, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Civilization Fanatics' Forums > CIVILIZATION III > Civ3 - Game of the Month

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 25, 2004, 12:53 PM   #1
Grazzit
Chieftain
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 21
Why aren't the GOTM using the Conquest expansion? NT

NT
Grazzit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 25, 2004, 01:02 PM   #2
ainwood
Watching.
 
ainwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 27,516
For a couple of reasons:

Firstly, there is no point in running a competition that we are not geared-up to support. We have been making great improvements in the basic things like getting the results out in a timely manner, and if we start on conquests now, then we will most likely slip back to the problem with results taking weeks....

Secondly, the bugs in Conquests, and the major rule changes that have been implimented with the successive patches mean that a tournament format for conquests is difficult. We will most likely only support v1.22f, but people playing succession games etc in 1.18f can't (at the moment) reliably patch to 1.22f, or they won't be able to reload their succession games...

But we will move to conquests, have patience.
ainwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2004, 06:50 AM   #3
grs
nameless one
 
grs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 1,909
Is 1.22 already an f = final version? I really hope not!
grs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2004, 09:52 AM   #4
EarlOfChester
Chieftain
 
EarlOfChester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
Posts: 21
I believe that it means final(ised) version as opposed to a beta version
EarlOfChester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2004, 03:32 PM   #5
AlanH
Mac addict, php monkey

 
AlanH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 25,250
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by EarlOfChester
I believe that it means final(ised) version as opposed to a beta version
Yes, that's what I thought. But I never quite understood the last full release number they brought out for the Mac - 1.21g. I guess when you've already produced a buggy 'f(final)' then 'g(etting there?)' was the only way to go . Ah well, that's water under the bridge now. Mac players have been running 1.29b for over a year now, waiting for 1.29f. P'raps 'b' actually means 'better', not 'beta' .
AlanH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Go Back Civilization Fanatics' Forums > CIVILIZATION III > Civ3 - Game of the Month > Why aren't the GOTM using the Conquest expansion? NT

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Conquest Expansion Civman33 Civ4 - Strategy & Tips 4 Nov 28, 2008 07:25 PM
conquest w/o casualties gotm geofelt Civ2 - Game of the Month 2 Aug 01, 2005 08:25 AM
GOTM 37 Conquest Class ainwood Civ3 - Game of the Month 0 Nov 15, 2004 01:41 AM
nt sourboy Sports Talk 0 Oct 06, 2004 01:02 AM
Next gotm <- No huts please! -NT Excilus Civ3 - Game of the Month 0 Dec 20, 2001 07:55 AM


Advertisement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is copyright © Civilization Fanatics' Center.
Support CFC: Amazon.com | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon CA | Amazon FR