We have meet C3B

GenMarshall

GenMarshall

Sin'dorei ISB Capt & Ghost Agent
Joined
Jun 17, 2002
Messages
44,512
Location
Night Haven, Vekta, United Systems of Arathor
I would like to adnounce that we have meet with C3B. Here is the log.

2(121802:121102:125002) 02(Pggar02) hi CG, who's responsible for the idsg2? I need to talk to any CFC official
02(121802:121302:120402) 02(CivGeneral02) yes, is it the C3C one or the PTW one?
02(121802:121302:121402) 02(Pggar02) C3C
02(121802:121302:122402) 02(CivGeneral02) yes, im in the C3C one
02(121802:121402:120802) 02(Pggar02) well, we met
02(121802:121402:123502) 02(CivGeneral02) May I ask what nation I am speeking to :)
02(121802:121502:120102) 02(Pggar02) I tried to contact you guys, but it's a bit hard to reach you
02(121802:121502:121902) 02(Pggar02) C3B
02(121802:121502:124502) 02(CivGeneral02) Nice to meet you :)

(Please excuse the mess that the NNS created)
 
What are we supposed to do now? :confused:
What chatroom are we supposed to use? #demogame_cfc_isdg?
We should ideally start trading soon, and I assume it's all to go through Zarn first?
 
To note, I have gotten this via a Private Chat message.
 
We know nothing as of yet, besides that we've met -- although i'm 99.99999% sure that it's the NE.

We urgently need our captain/FA guy to do something.
 
We would probaly want to get somone in the emmbassy or thier emmbassy soon. I am assuming we want to keep the ivoy a big secret for now. We should build the canal city soon to stop them from going south to find the ivory. Or we could move our new warrior to the canal cities' site to stop them.
 
Thanks for the news, CG. :)

I received this correspondence from C3B's leader, Pggar, at our msdg email address.

Our group of warriors have stumbled with some strange red dressed people.

We'll be holding the save for a while since we feel the need for a first
meeting.

I was thinking of something around 23:30 GMT.
We can use our chatroom, but since it's on cgn server, that might be a
bit too obvious.
We can use MSN, but since most of you guys don't seem to have it, that
might be a bad idea as well.
I think we can use CFC server, if the messenger thing doesn't work.

If you send a mail to this adress (jdd@civ3.com.br), all C3B government
members will receive your message.
I'll be out most of the day, and should be back around 22:00 GMT.
You can talk to either Bremp, Trigo or Keiselhorn during the day.
They're our current ministers and might be available during the day.

If you guys have MSN contacts, ICQ#, or any other means of fast
communication, let us know.
My contacts are:
MSN: pggar@hotmail.com
ICQ: 11143975

Other msn contacts:
bremp1@hotmail.com (Bremp)
dctrigo@hotmail.com (Trigo)
jose_damasceno@hotmail.com (Keisel)
Click to expand...
 
I then later received a PM from Pggar here at CFC. Though it was sent later, it was the first one I had read.

C3B meets CFC
As you will notice next turn, we've met.

I tried setting up a meeting today, but got no response.
I've sent a message to cfc demogame mail.
There you'll find most of our contatacs.

I was hoping to find some of yours.
An ambassador should be nominated pretty soon.
But it would be nice to have a quicker form of communication.

Let me now when a meeting is possible.
Let's try to get together in the next few days.

Pggar
C3B President
Click to expand...
 
Should we make a list of things we want an agreement on with this team?
 
Our group of warriors have stumbled with some strange red dressed people.
Click to expand...
If we look at our map:

attachment.php


That would either be our warrior in our core, or the warrior up north. I bet it's the north warrior.

We can try to get the canal-city up quickly, but a single fortified warrior blockade is also enough to keep them from our core. That will keep them guessing for some time longer.

What do we want from them ?
I suppose a tech leading to the Statue of Zeus.
We could do with a non-aggression pact. Not friendship; our ancient cavs will need some victims later on.
Further: nothing really.
 
My suggestions:
Tough approach: non-aggression pact until further notice, border is where we met, no, unit may advance towards each other, both units take defensive positions, or we reserve the right to respond with force;

Mild approach: let us both explore together but we block the isthmus (we need two warriors); non agression pact until further notice;

Friendly approach: let's be friends and trade techs allow each other to explore, 30 turns non-agression pact which cannot be canceled.
 
I sent a response to the C3B team this morning. Could Zarn or somebody please send a follow up email to them regarding entry to our Embassy chat room? Please post your correspondence here when you have finished.

Also everyone here is welcome to attend this historic meeting.

President Pggar and C3B Team,

The people of Fanatica are honored by your presence. I too agree that discussions should begin as soon as possible. If it helps, I will be available today(Monday) from 2130 GMT to around 0000 GMT.

We are doing our best to upgrade our communications techniques, but in the meantime please feel free to continue correspondence at msdg@civfanatics.net. Now that I know that we could receive more than just the save at this address, I will check it more often without the prompting of the Turn Thread. You can also PM me at CFC as Pggar did on late Sunday, or reach me by email at donovan_zoi@civfanatics.net.

Please let me know if my proposed time works for you and I will try to gather the citizenry all I can for this meeting. Please expect an email later today on how we can make this work.

Respectfully,

Donovan Zoi
President of Fanatica
Click to expand...
 
So that's tonight. Pretty long time to hold up the savegame. :undecide: So will we meet with mIRC?

I suppose Zarn should show up pretty quick. But Donovan, you can do the diplomacy too of course, since you're the president.

In any case, I suggest to play with open cards concerning techs. Let's trade as much as possible and tune our future research with them! Especially in the beginning one should try to take advantage to trade techs.
 
Originally posted by Yndy
My suggestions:
Tough approach: non-aggression pact until further notice, border is where we met, no, unit may advance towards each other, both units take defensive positions, or we reserve the right to respond with force;

Mild approach: let us both explore together but we block the isthmus (we need two warriors); non agression pact until further notice;

Friendly approach: let's be friends and trade techs allow each other to explore, 30 turns non-agression pact which cannot be canceled.
Click to expand...

I think we should go for friendly approach...


Who are they in the game, I mean what civ did they choose? :hmm:
 
If they are on the eastern landbridge there is one thing that must be given the highest priority: Close the landbridge!

If they are in the west we might have a problem if they go hostile...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Symphony D.
PROJECT: Alternate History Storage
Replies
18
Views
4K
Symphony D.
Symphony D.
vogtmurr
The Mysterious 'Sea Peoples' - vikings of the late Bronze Age, or refugees ?
Replies
9
Views
18K
Josu
Josu
Back
Top Bottom