1. Civ6 is coming out TODAY! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Main site is finally re-opened! We migrated it to a new CMS and gave it a new layout as well.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Downloads database has been migrated and re-opened! Check it out and post in Site Feedback if any issue. We have done URL re-write so that old links will continue to work.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. A new Civ6 theme forum style is now available and it's made the default forum style! Check it out and comment here.
    Dismiss Notice
  6. We have successfully migrated the forum from vBulletin to Xenforo! Please take a look around and report any issue you see in Site Feedback.
    Dismiss Notice

Absence Idea.

Discussion in 'Civ3 - Demo Game III: RPG' started by Sir John, Jun 7, 2003.


Do you acsept this idea?

  1. Yes

    4 vote(s)
  2. No

    2 vote(s)
  3. Other (Please sepcify)

    0 vote(s)
  1. Sir John

    Sir John The evil one...

    Jan 15, 2003
    Norway, Bodø
    Here are the basic rules for this idea:

    * an absence must be posted with from-to date and the affected characters in a specially designed absent-thread
    * before an absence, all units must be either inside the own territory or the controll of them must be given to someone.
    * the affected characters wont age or die. nor can anyone attack the territory and as such attack the troops in the territory.
    *If the player controles something that is vital to the game he would have to give controll of it to a player or a manager.
    *Players\Managers that controll a absent persons things will have to do so in the absent players best interest.
    *If something he owns becomes vital to the game a manager will controll it.
    *The absent player may write in his absent post how he want the managers\players to controll his things.
    *If the absent player isnt back to the date he set up, he is given 24h before the players things is "unfrozen"

    The point of this would be that people could leave tyhe rpg for a vacation or something witout having to start all over again when they return..

    It hasnt had its own discussion thread but it was discussed here: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?threadid=55064
  2. disorganizer

    disorganizer New Member

    Mar 30, 2002
    i say yes as we will need this to let people leave for some days without being dead. anyways, one thing should maybe be changed:
    if a player is absent and has given his troops to someone else, then those troops may NOT be in the "absented" territory nor go into that territory during the absence.
  3. disorganizer

    disorganizer New Member

    Mar 30, 2002
    btw: i would be interested in the reasons why people voted no here :)

Share This Page