No clue about the game that they made? Really?
Anyway, the patch looks great. Looking forward to the final release.
Civilization V: Brave New World Fall Patch Public Beta
- Thread starter dshirk
- Start date
No clue about the game that they made? Really?
Anyway, the patch looks great. Looking forward to the final release.
tomtom5858
Prince
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2013
- Messages
- 320
What, and granting Faith to the best resource in the game (Salt) wasn't crossing your mind when you thought those things were broken?
Aussie_Lurker
Deity
That is what I truly *love* about you Firaxis guys. You really, *really* go that extra distance to provide post-release support for your games. This looks like a truly amazing patch (indeed, almost like free DLC ;-) ).
Aussie.
Aussie.
Peng Qi
Emperor
I've seen a general performance decrease in smoothness of the UI's movements. Rendered movement seems OK so far, but the messages scrolling down the right side of the UI are extremely choppy.
Will download it tomorrow. I saw nothing about what is replacing the half of the Commerce finisher that's gotten bumped up the tree. Are we just assuming the change in the amount of gold generally makes the finisher more vital in comparison or...?
grandgeneralbob
Chieftain
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2011
- Messages
- 34
Will they actually add AI to MP?
Mudrac
Orc Warchief
I find it a little odd that Landsknecht appears in Civil Service for every civ, since now it is a social policy unit like Foreign Legion. I mean you get Commerce in the Medieval Era anyway.
Green_Power
Chieftain
I noticed this too. Especially in the city-state phase yes. This was very evident from the get go.
I'm playing a Standard sized game with my usual amount of Civs and CSs, and turns are usually very fast. Except the first one which we know always takes longer. But now, I noticed that the city-states icon stayed up much longer than before.
Peng Qi
Emperor
I'm...not sure what's odd about this.
Mudrac
Orc Warchief
Well it would be like seeing Foreign Legion in Replaceable Parts tech. I mean I doesn't bother me that much, it's just a little odd.
Sorry If I'm just not remembering right, but since the patch I'm seeing notifications about city-state protection pledges from players I haven't met yet that include their Civ name (e.g. Brazil, Siam). I don't remember that as being the case previously? Can someone confirm if that should be the case?
For example, I now know that Siam and Brazil are in my game because of these notices despite not having met them yet. All other Civs are still 'Unmet Player' on the score-card for example. I have met the city state they are pledging to protect.
For example, I now know that Siam and Brazil are in my game because of these notices despite not having met them yet. All other Civs are still 'Unmet Player' on the score-card for example. I have met the city state they are pledging to protect.
Mudrac
Orc Warchief
Yeah, pre-patch when you met a city-state protected by an unmet civ. It was written : "An Unmet Civ announces protecting city state blah, blah"
Ok, well that seems like a bug then. Now I'm seeing 'Siam announces' without having met them.
lockstep
Prince
You should write a bug report (see thread starting post by dshirk).
Krschtschn
Ananassafttrinker
I think i found a bug with the expansion promise made to AIs. When i settled sao paulo montezuma asked me to stop, i said yes and proceeded to settle salvador next to his capital. He still thinks the promise is fullfilled.
The settler kicking the Great General out of the city is another thing i hadn't noticed before.
The settler kicking the Great General out of the city is another thing i hadn't noticed before.
lockstep
Prince
Could be a bug -- OTOH, Salvador is much closer to your capital than Sao Paulo, and therefore possibly doesn't trigger the "broken promise" logic.
Vidszhite
Ya Girl Juniper & Friends
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2012
- Messages
- 370
Before the fall patch, they would get up in arms over if you could even see their territory on the same screen as where you settled, didn't matter if your capital was right there too. It's a bug -- yes, they should be more lenient, but not this lenient. If you settle adjacent to them, it should count.
On the topic of bugs, I found Salt and Ivory spawning in Grasslands. Civilopedia isn't saying they're supposed to spawn there. Considering that Ivory is normally only supposed to spawn in plains, and salt is normally reserved for low-food plots, this seems like a bug.
Spoiler :
Savegames: http://www.mediafire.com/download/75n77i78ppq1fjc/BUG_-_Plains_Luxes_in_Grasslands.Civ5Save
http://www.mediafire.com/download/85oc0koizwc2eqg/BUG_-_Plains_Luxes_in_Grass2.Civ5Save
Crossposted this in the 2K support forum as instructed. It's pending mod approval now.
