Legal Discussion, Const Article A.

[Provolution]

Whatever, just close down this debate. If a mistake happens, we just heavily ridicule the perpetrators abuse of the electoral process. I will do anything to invalidate a candidate not registered and coming after deadline seeking to compete with a registered and deadline complying candidate.

The wording of the Article itself is indeed irrelevant to the point I am making, as it can be interpreted widely.

 

[Chieftess]

You guys micromanage every single word too much... This is what drives some away.

 

[blackheart]

Whatever, just close down this debate. If a mistake happens, we just heavily ridicule the perpetrators abuse of the electoral process. I will do anything to invalidate a candidate not registered and coming after deadline seeking to compete with a registered and deadline complying candidate.

The wording of the Article itself is indeed irrelevant to the point I am making, as it can be interpreted widely.

That's kind of the point isn't it? Wording changes interpretations