1. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Main site is finally re-opened! We migrated it to a new CMS and gave it a new layout as well.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Downloads database has been migrated and re-opened! Check it out and post in Site Feedback if any issue. We have done URL re-write so that old links will continue to work.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. A new Civ6 theme forum style is now available and it's made the default forum style! Check it out and comment here.
    Dismiss Notice
  6. We have successfully migrated the forum from vBulletin to Xenforo! Please take a look around and report any issue you see in Site Feedback.
    Dismiss Notice

Ranged combat

Discussion in 'Civ5 - General Discussions' started by Kamamura, Sep 24, 2010.

  1. Kamamura

    Kamamura Chieftain

    Jun 16, 2005
    Well, the concept is sporked from the older games like Fantasy general, and so on.

    What's surprising is that they sporked only a part of it, and it does not seem to work too well.

    In Fantasy general, when ranged unit attacks a ranged unit, the defender retaliates - it seems only logical to me. Therefore, the "free shot" of civ 5 goes away.

    Also, ranged units provide fire support to adjacent melee units when those are attacked in melee - a nice feature promoting formation advance.

    Also, these games featured skirmishers that attacked only adjacent units, and only skirmishers could strike back (more complexity), as well as other interesting unit classes.

    I don't understand why Firaxis must reinvent the wheel by creating an obviously inferior hybrid (hint: poor AI?).
  2. Auncien

    Auncien Chieftain

    Feb 23, 2010
    Yeah I totally just spam (insert heavy artillery unit from each era) and it's laughable. Everything just dies.

Share This Page