Recent content by AThousandYoung

We're going for Diplomatic Victory. Mexico's our buddy, as is Canada.

Mech Infantry, Marines and Modern Armor, actually. The Mech Infantry are mostly occupying cities aren't they?

It would be ******ed if Muskets ignored walls but Cannons and Tanks did not.

I'm with hoops. Civ IV has already stereotyped every Civilization in terms of Starting Techs, UUs, UBs, and Leader Traits - as well as AI leader personalities. Why stop there? Or...why not eliminate these as well? No Praetorians for Rome! If Swordsmen are the best choice for Rome, then...

The Shadowrun universe has some interesting ideas about a restructured North America. However they used magic to make their alternate version of our world.

Beautiful, thanks.

All right. I changed the <bdisable> (not <disable>) from 0 to 1 for everything but Future Tech. However the game did not offer to let me research Future Tech when I started a new game. How come?

Thanks! thisismeaninglessstuffsothatmypostislongenoughtopostwockawocka

I think I removed the free civ techs. I need to erase the units and buildings then?

Hello, In my mod I decided I wanted to remove all the techs except Future Tech and start from scratch. In the CivIVTechInfos.xml file I removed all of the techs from the first <techinfo> to the last </techinfo>, except for Future Tech. When I tried to start I got a barrage of error...

I think many people are too impressed with Civ IV's "gameplay" and "balance".

The Aztecs did, except they had no iron.

I prefer them. They help give them impression of vast time periods between ages and your troops don't go obsolete before they arrive.

Hitler was working on tanks that size, but he was deposed before he could make many of them. Look up the Maus.