Some PC gamers seem really upset by the announcement of this game. They seem to think that if it doesn't come out for PC it's not a good game. Typical PC elitists.
Maybe mastery should be somewhat random but be influnced by what you do. The more you would use the discovery benefits the more likely to master the tech. There would be a base chance each turn that each of your techs become mastered, say 5%. The player could increrase the chance of a tech...
The AI wouldn't have to be so cut throat and ruthless to be competitive if winning by peaceful means was a real option for the player. A realistic AI would make many alliances and would cooperate with the other civs. A competitive AI would singularly focus on destroying everyone else. With...
Well what Firaxis descriped didn't seem like full blown civil wars. From what they said a single colony city just becomes automaticly independent when they no longer like you.
One possible positive caused by Civil war could be an economy boost. In the American Civil war at least, the Union's economy boomed and the unemployment rates dropped drasticly. Maybe soom exta production or money?
Unfortuately that's the only Civil War that I have studdied in detail. Does...
Well, I just finally had the time to read through this thread and I think I agree with dh_epic. Most suggestions had been add unit X, include leader Y, or make building Z. However there is still a lot of time till Civ 5 so I don't doubt that the community will be able to come up with some...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.