Recent content by Formaldehyde

Does this mean the Bible should be ignored?

Like I said, you just don't seem to understand what a strawman actually is. Since I was obviously not "refuting" his "argument", which wasn't even "advanced" by him, it couldn't possibly be a strawman. And I still won't "answer his question" as I already explained why. You might as well ask me...

Most everybody "does this". It is actually the basis for many threads, including this one. There were 6 different articles cited in the very first 5 pages of this thread, all by different people. If you don't like it, tough noogies. Don't read those posts. Furthermore, hardly anybody but you...

Exactly. At no stage did I claim or even insinuate that was his opinion. Now did I?

I'm sure you think your interpretation of the Bible is the only correct one, just like so many other Christians who completely disagree with you. 3 Reasons “Love The Sinner, Hate The Sin” Is An Abomination

"Arrogantly" incessantly complaining about this hardly means anybody else actually agrees with you. It is actually the basis for most threads. It's not. It was an interesting article even if I disagree with his assertions. Thanks for posting it. Ironically, Commodore just did the very same...

If you actually read the article, you would notice it was already mentioned. "As for the rest of your rant, nonsense." Hating the supposed "sin" is just a terrible excuse to hate, which is completely contrary to the actual teaching of Jesus (who is a Muslim prophet).

There is a difference between not using Halloween to demean other cultures and ethnic groups during campus activities and freedom of speech. Again, freedom of speech is ironically flourishing in this particular instance at both Yale and even in this thread discussing this very matter. So...

Of course you do. Let’s Be Honest… “Hate the Sin, Love the Sinner” is Really Just Hate

It is quite simple. I merely disagree with your assertion regarding this matter that she was "showing her prejudice and acting unprofessionally". The rest is just so much utter nonsense, which you so frequently use to try to obfuscate what the issues really are.

Granted, there have been times when they have shown less than proper journalistic restraint. But this clearly isn't one of them. The article was quite well done and summarized what this matter is about quite eloquently.

As usual, you don't seem to know the actual facts regarding this matter. She has clearly stated her position numerous times and it obviously isn't "prejudicial and unprofessional" in the least. You seem to have missed the point that he was actually calling for Parliament to "have a debate to...

Why? Because the article is laden with facts regarding this particular matter and presents both sides in a reasonable manner?

Therein lies the problem. You know even less about Islam than those who are beheading people. But that certainly isn't going to stop you from hating and vilifying the overwhelming majority of peaceful Muslims out of 1.6 billion adherents, just like so many other Americans since 9/11.

She only laughed once at the entirely ludicrous notion that any of these issues couldn't be brought up before Parliament without an "international men's day". That is hardly "showing her prejudice and acting unprofessionally". :lmao: That is because they clearly do not. It is just yet another...