Lohrenswald
Reaction score
1,201

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • I changed it about two weeks ago. I haven't really liked my old name for awhile now - too clunky - and I just realized that this site is basically the only one which still uses it, so I figured it was high time to just go for it.
    I am ready to come to the negotiating table regarding the Altered Maps issue. Are YOU?
    Takhisis
    Takhisis
    Oh… sorry, I misunderstood you at the time. I remember I deleted a couple titles accidentally and mistyped the 15 as XV. It wasn't a prank or anything, just an oversight. I've fixed it now. Sorry, I thought you were posturing or something.
    Lohrenswald
    Lohrenswald
    You seriously think I would be antagonistic just for the hell of it?
    Takhisis
    Takhisis
    I *am* saying sorry for it.
    Howdy. Not long ago I've seen you posted a question in maths section of the forum which gathered my attention. Since it has been resolved there. I just wanted to recommend a couple of books to you. But this space doesn't allow me to say much so you may want to check in your conversations feed for that purpose. Btw its always nice to meet somebody who has similar interests as me. Hope to befriend you. :)
    Jeg sende noen blomar til Von Listhaug fra deg jeg. Går greit det?
    Lohrenswald
    Lohrenswald
    Veittu, jeg har ikke fulgt med på nyhetene i det siste

    Jeg har fått med meg at hun har gjort ett eller annet, og at regjeringa visstnok kan falle på grunn av det, men jeg veit ikke hva :/
    Synobun
    Synobun
    i agree with both of you about this in-depth analysis
    Lohrenswald
    Lohrenswald
    Har lest om saken nå

    flott å ha rasismepartiet i regjering
    You're fine with derailing my profile page though?!
    Lohrenswald
    Lohrenswald
    my threads are worth far more than your measly profile page
    Snerk
    Snerk
    In a 1000 years my profile page will be the base of a religion. Well that or a meme.
    Vincour's signature is smaller. Just a helpful tip.

    EDIT: Also, you misspelled moderator with an e before the final r.
    Lohrenswald
    Lohrenswald
    regular users can't put "moderator" in their user title, so the misspelling was necessary

    I'll change the signature text size, though
    Mouthwash
    Mouthwash
    Maybe use Vincour's pre-mod user title? If you can remember lol.
    Synobun
    Synobun
    my pre-mod user title was a default "Chieftain"
    The posts that look like jokes except they aren't? All right, I'll tone them down a bit just for the sake of communication.
    Lohrenswald
    Lohrenswald
    do you seriously not understand the new post wall system?
    Takhisis
    Takhisis
    Derp. This is the only non-vBulletin forum I'm on.
    What I was saying, since we're at it, is that our anarchist's post would indicate that the fragmentation of states would help praxis, i.e. finally taking anarchism from theory into practice, because the states would be weaker and less capable of responding.
    Lohrenswald
    Lohrenswald
    maybe you should make more posts like this instead of not-jokes
    Vi har gitt andregradslikningen x^2 + px + q = 0.
    a) Vis at produktet av røttene/løsningene i likningen er q.
    b) Vis at summen av røttene/løsningene i likningen er -p.

    Greit å vise med eksempel men hvordan blir beviset?
    Snerk
    Snerk
    det var også utgangspunktet mitt men syns det ble hårete. kan du vise?
    Lohrenswald
    Lohrenswald
    skal prøve å ordne det i morra

    skanning er litt omstendig med opsettet her og jeg er lat :/
    Snerk
    Snerk
    tsk tsk
    Synobun
    Synobun
    get this devil tongue outta here
    • Like
    Reactions: Snerk
    Lohrenswald
    Lohrenswald
    Er det løsninga du spør om? for ligningssettet er jo bare (x-2)^2+(y-3)^2=10 og x-3y=-13

    men settet har to løsninger, så du må kanskje vise at bare den éne gjelder
    • Like
    Reactions: Snerk
    Snerk
    Snerk
    Aah, øffkørs. Jeg leste at linkningssettet skulle bestå av de to måtene å regne ut BAvek*BCvek, og fikk det ikke til å stemme.

    Jepp, bare en løsning faller i 2. kvaderant som oppgaven spør etter.

    /hisses at Vincour
    I'm doing as well as I can. Every day under Trump is like waiting to see what terrible thing will be next.

    How is your 2017 going?
    Lohrenswald
    Lohrenswald
    Fairly decent I think. I kinda don't want to burden you with everything I've got going on, like I've done in the past.

    Was hoping to sort of pick up reading stuff again, hasn't gone super well but I've read a bit at least
    GoodEnoughForMe
    GoodEnoughForMe
    Not a burden!

    Hey, a little bit of reading is still a little bit. I go through phases where I read less or more than usual. Not a big deal really. Any amount helps.
    /puts on ancient robe
    /opens ancient book
    /chants ancient chant

    Loooooohrius matematicus!

    kan du vise meg hvordan du deriverer disse funksjonene?

    2x√x (fasit 3√x)

    √x / x^2 (fasit 3 / 2x^2 √x)

    x-2 / √x (fasit x+2 / 2x√x)

    Jeg kan regnereglene til dette men etellerannet med x'ene i rot som jeg ikke får til.
    Lohrenswald
    Lohrenswald
    Jeg får også −3/(2x^(5/2)) på den andre, så hvis du har sjekket fasiten nøye så er den nok feil (det skjer dessverre av og til).

    Jeg har litt problemer med den siste lol. Er det x-2 / √x eller (x-2) / √x?

    Svaret på det siste spørsmålet er nei. (-1/2)*(x-2)=(2-x)/2
    Lohrenswald
    Lohrenswald
    jeg har løst det nå, problemet var bare at jeg var for lat til å utvide brøker.

    med (-1/2)*(x-2)=(2-x)/2 får du riktig svar i 3, siden x^(3/2)=x√x

    greia med (-1/2)*(x-2)=(2-x)/2 er at du må gange begge tallene inne i parantesen med -1
    Snerk
    Snerk
    "med (-1/2)*(x-2)=(2-x)/2 får du riktig svar i 3, siden x^(3/2)=x√x"
    jepp, men jeg hadde nok ikke sett den om jeg ikke hadde fasiten.
    "greia med (-1/2)*(x-2)=(2-x)/2 er at du må gange begge tallene inne i parantesen med -1"
    ja ser det nå. slurvefeil fra meg.

    men det skal ikke blir (2-x) i teller, skal bli (x+2)
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Top Bottom