Why nuclear plants over nuclear weapons? Though, the singularity is more of a wild card.
Your opinion isn't based on fact. All new nuclear plant designs are literally orders of magnitude less likely to result in a "meltdown" due to their passive safety that don't require operators...
He might have meant a pure fusion bomb. The first hydrogen bomb was tested in 1952, btw. The Nagasaki and Hiroshima bombs were fission only.
You don't want to go bigger with a composite bomb because of the fallout.
Uh, HVDC??? DC transmission can use over 150% AC voltage to get the same dielectric stress on the insulators. Running at that voltage would give you much less losses in comparison.
What? Solar power is coming down still, and better tech will come.
The "nothing in particular"'s tend to have spiritual beliefs and a belief in a god. The religiously unaffiliated include atheists, agnostics and people who do not identify with any particular religion in surveys.
Agnostics are really atheists. ; )
Some of those I find okay, but I don't like all the bug sanctuaries, the desserts, and all the different breads, for sure. Speaking of this, I've got some new things for you to consider, MrAzure. XD
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.