Recent content by s1ngl3play3r

Thanks a lot for posting this! :thumbsup:

His greatest crime imo is that he turned Civilization into a board game, where ai "backstabs" you when you are "winning" because ai also wants to "win" which eliminates the concept of immersion and ruined the game for me. This was intentional and this was his idea if I remember correctly.

You really pissed me off today, CivFanatics... I do have a sense of humor I assure you, but jeeez since were all waiting for the expansion so much, that was kinda cruel ;(

:goodjob:

200$? :lol: I spent about 300$ on a new videocard and about 80-90 $ on the game (and I wanted to spend more, much more :blush:), played about 100 hours and figured out I actualy enjoy reading civfanatics more than playing the game. :D

:crazyeye: There's a contradiction right there I'm surprised you don't see it. Civ IV's diplo victories were great imho.

hey am I the only one here who's tired of topics like "CIV 4 or CiV", "Should I buy CiV", etc. (no offence intended)

I like Civ4:Col a lot, brings back memories... :)

this.

What bugs me most is that I don't really care about winning. I care more about immersion. In civ IV I have the feeling I'm building an empire and like in the real life I have friends I can rely on and enemies that hate me. Winning in civ1-civ4 has never been an ultimate goal for me. In CiV you...

:mad: city razing now drains happiness (again), longer time between turns, the game crashed after about 150 turns (never crashed before the patch).

"- AI is now capable of denouncing friends (aka, backstabbing) and added backstabbing info to diplo overview screen." This is ridiculous, they didn't change a thing it seems... Edit: maybe I'm being a bit harsh, have to test it for myself first.

I think you are refering to stuff other civilizations can trade/sign, i.e. pacts of cooperation, research agreements, etc.

Doom 1/2

Someone should update the main post, Greg added a bunch of stuff 11/18.