Recent content by Seidrik_The_Gray

Thank you for the hard work! I am very happy to have this mod to play while waiting for a great mod on CiV to one day come out :)

I have played through several itterations on Prince, Monarch, and Emperor. Granted, with my 2007 Dell laptop, I often find the turn grinding too tedious to advance into the Industrial age, but I enjoy this mod emmensely and can't wait to upgrade my laptop to a 64 bit system with more memory and...

Haha! I got it working! Silly me, when I got rid of the lua and art defines xml files I had scrubbed the civilization and text xml files but I forgot the unit xml files! Turns out Kael had changes some information in there also that was incompatible once one removed the art defines and lua...

This was going to be my first mod. Playing around to see how it worked. Carthage was working on its own just fine but Celts now show just txt errors. So I got started trying to fix and then tried to combine into one mod... I've since learned that I was doing way too much work, lol...

I have been trying to get the Queen of Icenii mod to work with the Carthaginian Empire via combining the two mods using ModBuddy. According to the tutorials this should be fairly easy. However, when I "Build" the mod and get it into my game, and I enable it, the two civs aren't even there...

The Carthaginians seem to be the most compatible. The Celts' txt_key issues are just too annoying. I have tried using the modbuddy myself to get the Celts and the Carthaginian empires to work as one mod, but no luck so far. You would think it should be easy. However, I am used to civ IV...

I think this is great! Honestly, I used to be able to conquer a whole civilization just marching from one city to the next with two swordsmen and a few archers. Now, I really need catapults and I really need to focus on maximizing my attacks on the city in one turn. You shouldn't be able to...

I believe the game does take into account the differences in military strength, beyond the number of units, and the defensive strength of your cities. However, there is a point, where the AI feels like you've pinned them in a corner and "It's now or never!" or "I know I will lose, but ..." or...

I have no problem with this. You get to view the city first and it's relatively easy to determine if you want it or not. I raze allot of cities in my games actually. I also carefully place cities for strategic and resource reasons. I don't see the problem here. It would be an exploit...

I for one love this map! I would like to see Babylon and Mongolia added, but beyond this, I have no issue with it. Russia and the River Warlords do seem to build up right now, but this could only be stopped with the Vikings, Mongols, Zulus, Ethiopians, and Carthage being added in as real civs...

Marathon is way too slow for me. Continents map is too boring. Earth and Archipelagos are great! Earth map plays like a Pangea map with a continent across the ocean, but if you're on the "Old World" side then there's no incentive to go to the new world, especially if you start in Asia or...

Ahhh! I told you it might be a stupid question! Thank you!

I would love to see a Mod that did at least what I propose in #2.

My games on the comp hardly ever get to the Modern era, but I haven't played an unmodded game in a long time. The last time I fired a nuke was with the Total Realism mod playing on the Earth Map in Civ 4 Warlords. It was allot of fun, but I had to slow myself down just to make sure I hadn't...

I only enjoy limited cities in certain scenarios where the cities are located historically and/or based on specific snenario requirements and where no settlers are required. The following might work better: 1) Rather than allowing the cities to be limited, I wouldn't mind using a slider...