Recent content by Zagoroth

Well, its a good thing nobody started a discussion...

Too bad it emphasizes misinterpretations of evolution...

Rhye giveth and Rhye taketh away. And I can honestly not believe "giveth" and "taketh" are considered words on this website...

I bet they are making fun of us in Chinese:rolleyes:.

Why not settle North America? Denver, Chicago, and New Orleans are great city spots which I believe have those resources.

Best. Web Series. Ever.

I think it would be ironic... if we were all made of iron. Ten points for whoever gets the reference...

Along with making them unflippable, how about also having a UHV requirement to specifically settle those lands. That way the human player will not accidentally make the game harder for themself.

Wouldn't all their land be in other civ's flip zones? You would be left with one city, wherever your capital happens to be, culturally pressed on all sides. How about a UHV that focuses on the time before the Europeans spawn.

Oh, I think I misread his post... I suppose the phalanx was defending the city that flipped to him?

The reason that happened is because Greece declared war on you, because of the city flip. This treats the occurrence as Greece trying to stop you from revolting from them. Thus you receive extra legions. It is a great to be able to expand into the east early on. As a side note, I would recommend...

TDK created a modmod where it was possible to play as the Byzantines. It is in the main section of the forum.

Could you post some pictures of the scenario?

There are many factors that contribute to stability loss. They suffer an immediate hit from losing cities. They will also in time become unstable due to you possessing cities in their core territory, and due to a severe economic drop by the loss of their land. The latter the game checks every...

You should settle and keep Chicago, Denver, and New Orleans. The rest of the cities do not matter as you should liberate them to vassals