back to HoF, I want to congratulate Sun Tzu Wu and tachy for playing and winning non trivial games and thus improving the HoF tables!
I'm last with 550 BC.
And I'm not THAT bad at the game (I think so at least).
the luck part is big, though
well, it was a low hanging fruit I already had, but still worth a lot of quattro points
edit: congrats to you STW!!! and a lot of congrats to...
thanks seraiel, no big deed
but enough to get my 4th place back in the quattromaster table :)
My guess too
I even won a gauntlet!
That's kind of a proof:blush:
congrats to kovacsflo too!!
nice to see things moving here
tried my hands on this one
I'm a bit rusty, so I didn't do too well.
121k points for me. Should be no match to a dedicated player.
OK, I'll start playing again ;)
I would think that 1 requirement would be to be already at least quattromaster,
so eliminating the need to play the easiest leaders wouldn't...
Why not focus only on the hardest ones?
that eliminates the romans, inca, persia, egypt, india and 2 out 3 english. at least.
for 1, the answer is yes, I have quite a lot non ancient start #1s
for 2, I asked once, got a yes, but I'm not entirely convinced. In effect, it's...
I had a failed attempt to kill an AI spaceship before.
And I can tell I took the capital, because when you get the message "xx launched", you can...
211k points isn't too bad!
great game all
no, you'll need troops to cover the land
3 cavalries for 1 MG. No big deal ;)
looks like a hard game.
If I try (mostly playing other games these days, so not sure), I'd go for ramses for high power chariots + possible...
you won't level up with a warlord game.
You get a lot more points (even from a not so well performing game) for high level + large maps.
congrats to the winners
I didn't play, but I'm sure I couldn't have come even close. Very good games!
go for it
Separate names with a comma.