If it is really difficult for you to beat emperor so I will just put this here2018-04-06 23.10.28 by Lord.L. posted Jul 5, 2018 at 10:21 PM
Well actually it is very easy:shifty:
Just place all your cities in 1 tile distance from each other
Just a lucky and professional gameplay. Everything you need to try this was already described in Earth thread.
No cheating, some luck and enormous knowledge of the game.
I have seen it already. And I think that 1920 BC is an unbelievable result.
Have conquered the world in 1920 BC. Has anybody done it earlier?...
What is the real reason why do you want so big population after game's former end? You don't obtain any score anymore and without Future Tech and...
To do so you need settlers. Settlers eat food. Lesser food means lesser population.
Sometimes when you conquer a city of size 1 it survives despite it shouldn't. Why is this happening?
I have version 475.01 and I have no extra unhappiness
EDIT: Also I have never seen very unhappy citizens
And why are you writing this in civ 1 thread?
Somebody wrote that after you have a certain number of cities every citizen after first will be unhappy. But I have never actually experienced...
What was the highest difficulty you won?
But have you won Emperor+2? Actually I think that difference between Chieftain and Emperor+1 is nothing compared to difference between Emperor+1...
There is a problem: I am the only who develops good techs since I conquer enemies very quickly so they can't even have chariots in most cases.
Yes I have and I won
Got a message: "Scandal in Samarkand!". It's not my city and I haven't got embassy. What is this?
Separate names with a comma.