pineappledan
Deity
Counterproposal to this:
The skirmisher ability that buffs them in open terrain and nerfs them in rough has been a mistake. We would be better off with the old skirmisher, and with this promotion not existing.
Other proposals have suggested lowering their RCS, but giving them logistics, lowering their RCS and giving them +1 movement, or a combination of these with some sort of flanking bonus.
If we can't agree on one of those other proposals for what the skirmisher line should do, can we at least agree that they Shouldn't have this daft terrain bonus?
CounterProposal: Skirmisher Terrain Promotion only affects RCS when Attacking
Counterproposal to: https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/proposal-skirmisher-1-cs-12-11-cs.678965/ The old Accuracy and Barrage promotions from the base game used OpenRangedAttackMod and RoughRangedAttackMod, which only affected Ranged Combat Strength when attacking. We could use these...
forums.civfanatics.com
The skirmisher ability that buffs them in open terrain and nerfs them in rough has been a mistake. We would be better off with the old skirmisher, and with this promotion not existing.
Other proposals have suggested lowering their RCS, but giving them logistics, lowering their RCS and giving them +1 movement, or a combination of these with some sort of flanking bonus.
If we can't agree on one of those other proposals for what the skirmisher line should do, can we at least agree that they Shouldn't have this daft terrain bonus?