Archbob
Ancient CFC Guardian
I'd rather have Clark over Deam and yes, that is my final answer.
Not me. I voted for both Bush's. I will say that this one is clearly the better of the two.Originally posted by Zarn
I think he will barely hold enough popularity then he will lose popularity before the election making it worse for the Crats. You would be better off with someone else.
Originally posted by Laughing Gull
Dean said he would break up Fox because they're too big and powerful. as a result, he does not have a snowball's chance in hell at being president.
Many people agree with you, I hear that alot. Just keep in mind that their are other people out there who do care who the president is, and that those people and their candidate may not have your best interests in mind when they formulate their policies. Its better to act than to be acted uponOriginally posted by RoddyVR
i cant believe all you people actualy think that it MATTERS who the president is, not to even mention the candidates for president.
I doubt Dean ever said that.
I also dont see why Christianity in a president is some important.
Originally posted by Speedo
No he didn't. But he did (since he's now entertaining southern voters in the coming primaries) decide to reveal how "deeply religious" he was by telling us that his favorite book in the Bible, Job, was in the New Testament.
According to a poll I saw just yesterday, about 60% of Americans disagree with you. Well, I think it did say "religious" not specifically "Christian."
Odd how your quick to leap at that and never catch Bush's mistakes.
Originally posted by Speedo
Besides it reveals the character of the man- self proclaimed "deeply religious" but not familiar with his own (also self proclaimed) favorite book of the Bible?
It is sad though, the way he trips all over himself to try and cover up things he's said before. Like his comments about the caucuses being dominated by extremist interests (completely true IMO), but now that he wants those extremists behind him, well....
Personally I think that if Dean had tried to be himself more, he would have been decent. Instead his only real appeal is as the "anti-Bush." He'll probably swing more towards moderate if he gets the nomination, but all his pandering to the far left now is alienating too many moderate Dems.
Where do you get that they were not Christian. You can make the argument about Jefferson because he believed all the miracles in the Bible were fable. Washington was at least titularly a Christian and sometimes practicing. Lincoln on the other hand was downright devout.Originally posted by archer_007
I doubt Dean ever said that. I also dont see why Christianity in a president is some important. Our three best president (Washington, Lincoln, and Jefferson) we not Christians.
That's a mouthfull, its a bad case of Quayle disease plus some Goritus. In fact, he makes Gore's double takes look like the straight and narrow. Clark has the same problem, but in his case some of the goofs can be atributed to not having thought through the issue yet.Originally posted by Speedo
It is sad though, the way he trips all over himself to try and cover up things he's said before. Like his comments about the caucuses being dominated by extremist interests (completely true IMO), but now that he wants those extremists behind him, well...