Timsup2nothin
Deity
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2013
- Messages
- 46,737
It's also possible they decided they didn't like any of the QBs available, because they all had flaws (which is why there was no clear cut #1). If they preferred Justin Herbert or Drew Lock they may have decided to take Barkley and just write this season off since their roster, quite frankly, sucks butt. This will in all likelihood be their 4th +10 loss season in 5 years and that's not all on Eli.
I think it is reasonably proven at this point that having a QB available that you like is not as useful a determinant as having a team that is ready. I don't think that anyone would argue against Andrew Luck, coming out of college, having an absolute mountain of qualifications over Russell Wilson, and being universally liked by every team. But none of that mattered when it came down to which team was prepared for a run and which team wasn't. Putting it in perspective, let's say that right before the Giants made their pick a miraculous time machine and cloning device dropped an exact duplicate of Andrew Luck into the draft. Would the Giants have gained anything by taking him?
All the QBs available had flaws, but got taken anyway. Some were taken because the team doing the picking is just finally ready after years of grunt prep work under very unpleasant circumstances. (Cleveland) Others were taken because the team doing the picking thinks that somehow a miracle can occur if only the right magic touch quarterback falls into their hands. (NY Jets) Giants fans don't want to believe they are the next Cleveland Browns and facing several seasons in hell, but management didn't want to be the Jets either.