Note he has faced numerous charges of sexual assault, has said he would "protect women whether they like it or not", notoriously said "when you're a star, you can do anything" (before saying some extremely inappropriate stuff)
Even if there is a former president or candidate who commits sexual assault or various crimes
Those guys won't be charged.
This is to prevent the president in power controlling elections by falsely accusing his rivals.
Even if Trump does, this behavior is obviously an abuse of power by the government.
But I don't think he has.
Purely my personal opinion.
Because these candidate of president are (usually) very careful
Even if they are not careful, their staff will be careful.
If these candidate have criminal records that may be detrimental to the election, they can let an agent or puppet run the election for him.
Accusing Trump of sexual assault is as unreasonable as Republicans accusing Biden of being a sexual assault criminal.
Even if their "friends" were sexually assaulted, these politicians themselves would not be involved.
At least Trump only admitted that he paid hush money, but he did not admit that he had any sexual relations with those woman.
If he paid hush money, he can insist on his legitimacy even if he had sexual assault.
Because the woman take his hush money and accusing Trump, it is close to they are blackmailing Trump.
Anyway, the people who voted for him don’t believe that he didn’t commit sexual assault too.
He can be just admit it but he don't.
Also, the new White House Staff don't seem to be worried that they will be sexually assaulted.
Do trans women not go to jail or something?
Does v coding not exist in your mind
edit:
The moral panic over trans people and kids being able to transition both socially and in limited cases, medically, is insane and I'm sick and tired of being told these people have "valid concerns" about it and that they aren't coming from a place of anti-trans animus or ignorance, no one would bat an eyelid if a cis kid was put on hormones or hormone blockers because being cis isn't treated like a disease or a moral failing or a mental illness but being trans is seen as all three, even by those that claim to be allies but jettison us as soon as the going get's tough.
Oh yeah, I don't those terms about v-coding, but I know some of the people will take hormones medicine or doing a surgery for sex changing.
But I don't see those republicans and Trump voter is going to hate those transgender.
If it is a illusion they made in the internet, their workers will be more than the Chinese Communist Party I think. Quite impossible.
Do you realize you're talking to a trans minor? Also I don't think many regions in the USA use taxpayer money for gender affirming care.
I can't understand why you think this is reasonable.
When I first listened to them(the Trump voters), I thought the government paying for transgender surgeries was just an exaggeration from Trump voters.
Because it sounds to me like if this really happened, the US government would be really sick (even if it just happened few times)
But if Democrats feel like you, though that they shouldn't care about those few money.
I will begin to understand why Americans like the slogan "America First"... actually I was though it just a meaningless gimmick.
Maybe some wealthy people should set up a charity fund to provide convenience for who want to be a transgender people.
But the government shouldn't spend a penny on this
Let me make it clear that money should be given to those who “need” it, not to those who “want" it
Gender transition is obviously not a "need", but closer to a "luxury".
Even if someone needs it, they should pay in their own pocket
Especially when inflation occurs, poor people will hate it.
Those who are suffering from life, those who are facing the crisis because of money, those who are fighting hard for the people they care, those who abide by the law and deserve praise, even among transgender people there may be poor people....
Why don't they take the money first?
If the Democratic Party has such a mentality like this and would rather provide transgender subsidized services than give that money to the poor...
The poor will only think that those Democrats are playing the game of the rich and treat them as abandoned fools.
But maybe Americans are much richer than I thought, so maybe being poor isn't really that painful.
After all, I have only experienced my own poverty, not American poverty.
But I don’t think it’s okay to spend money in this way, although it’s not a lot of money.
The Democrats don't really do the media suppression thing, or not as much as the Republicans do so. The very red state of Florida has banned or tried to ban numerous books such as Anne Frank's Diary of a Young Girl, Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, and Toni Morrison's Beloved and Louisiana tried passing a law making it so every classroom had to have the Ten Commandments in them.
Actually I don't know what book it is.
But if you said it is real, It is not suppression, it just a censorship.
The suppression is
If you read the book, the bureaucracy will give you trouble or hire the underworld to attack you.
If you agree with the book, you will go to jail.
Go to your school, go to your work place and send a lot of complaint letter and tell the boss to fire you although you do nothing wrong.
Go to your home and find your family for harassment.
Taking your photo for creating fake news.
Said you are a bad people in the television, if anyone help you, they are betraying the value of the Party and Country.
And you even not allow to say you don't want to ban the book.
I can't give all examples of it, actually it is more way to do if it is suppression, and it wouldn't be just banned the books.
Also note that Trump's Project 2025 (don't say the Heritage Project and Trump are on different camps of the right, Trump has worked with numerous members of the Heritage Project in the past) will not only ban abortion nationwide and increase the effects of climate change, it will also make America more isolationist and less of a semi-benevolent force (note I don't say the USA has been always a good force in global politics... there are numerous examples of nations America has ruined) that has been helping NATO and the UN.
I read news everyday.
He said Ukraine and Taiwan take the US money and steal their job first, and next day said he will help Ukraine and Taiwan, and the third day is he won't send any army to there, and the next day will be Taiwan and Japan must pay more money to US, and next next day ...well, I tired to write it all.
He also changed his statement many times on the issue of abortion, and the last version is it belongs to the state government decision
I don't know how many people notice that.
And I heard all what actually Trump wants, all the nonsense this guy talks is basically a "talking skill"
to intimidate those allies pay the money,
to drop the Taiwan financial market and let the money go back to US
those China and India didn't go to comply with the climate agreement...
something like that.
I don't know how many people in US noticed that "talking skill" of it
but actually other country use "talking skill" too, just they talk much beautiful than Trump and it is difficult to know they are intimidate their allies and playing tricks too.
And another cruel thing is if you don't bring back the industrial to the West, global warming will be much more dangers.
Although you don't produce the dirty industrial in your country, the dirty industrial will build in the countries with bad regulations and corruption.
The dirty industrial always needed, and the corruption countries will make those factory produce the pollution ineffectively for making more money, because if there are any problem on it, the dictator can shut our mouth.
And the dirty industrial will progress and nothing can stop....because you western will buy those product made by dirty industrial and satisfied your country has no dirty industrial.
Also the dictator can use those industrial and money as weapon to push their authoritarian agenda.