Voting Instructions
Players, please cast your votes in the poll above. Vote "Yea" if you'd be okay if this proposal was implemented. Vote "Nay" if you'd be okay if this proposal wasn't implemented.
You can vote for both options, which is equivalent to saying "I'm fine either way", but adds to the required quorum of 10 votes in favor.
All votes are public. If you wish, you can discuss your choice(s) in the thread below. You can change your vote as many times as you want until the poll closes.
VP Congress: Session 3, Proposal 3
Rationale: First to be 100% clear, I am not making this proposal because I think the new ranged unit model is bad. I think its working reasonably well. The reason I propose this is because it was one of the last big changes made before the congress system was made, and I think its reasonable to run it through the congress to ensure people prefer the new model to the old.
Proposal: Return the ranged line to the pre-2.6 version. If anything is missing here, again the goal is to change everything to be before the 2.6 version came out.
Players, please cast your votes in the poll above. Vote "Yea" if you'd be okay if this proposal was implemented. Vote "Nay" if you'd be okay if this proposal wasn't implemented.
You can vote for both options, which is equivalent to saying "I'm fine either way", but adds to the required quorum of 10 votes in favor.
All votes are public. If you wish, you can discuss your choice(s) in the thread below. You can change your vote as many times as you want until the poll closes.
VP Congress: Session 3, Proposal 3
Rationale: First to be 100% clear, I am not making this proposal because I think the new ranged unit model is bad. I think its working reasonably well. The reason I propose this is because it was one of the last big changes made before the congress system was made, and I think its reasonable to run it through the congress to ensure people prefer the new model to the old.
Proposal: Return the ranged line to the pre-2.6 version. If anything is missing here, again the goal is to change everything to be before the 2.6 version came out.
- Slinger: Removed
- Archer:
- Returned to the Trapping Technology
- Cost: 55 hammers
- Obsoletes at: Mathematics
- CS: 4
- RCS: 6
- Composite Bowman
- Returned to the Mathematics Technology
- Cost: 90 hammers
- Obsoletes at: Machinery
- CS: 11
- RCS: 11
- Mayan Atlatist
- Cost: 80 hammers
- Returned to Mathematics
- Obsoletes at: Metallurgy
- CS: 11
- RCS: 11
- +33% RCS when attacking wounded units
- Incan Slinger (name updated)
- Cost: 55 hammers
- On: Trapping
- Obsoletes at: Machinery
- CS: 4
- RCS: 7
- 80% withdraw chance
- Ignore ZOC
- Attacks reduce CS by 15% for 5 turns
Last edited by a moderator: