3 pop. whips & pop. 3 whips

Olson

Warlord
Joined
May 5, 2013
Messages
283
Location
Long Island, NY
I'm coming across a number of references to "3 pop. whips" and "pop. 3 whips". I think some are confusing the two (incl. me) but my question is about "pop. 3 whips" if that's when a city is at 3 population, whips a 1 pop. build (the max. at 3 pop.), resulting in losing 1 pop., and, therefore, becoming a 2 population city.

It seems popular to whip at pop. 3 and I can see why:
- A newly settled city has 1 pop. to store 22 food (F) in order to grow to 2 pop.
- A 2 pop. city has 2 pop. to store 24F (12F ea.) to grow to 3 pop.
- A 3 pop. city has 3 pop. to store 26F (8.66F ea.) to grow to 4 pop.
- A 4 pop. city has 4 pop. to store 28F (7F ea.) to grow to 5 pop.

The 4 pop. city's extra pop. over a 3 pop. city doesn't significantly decrease the F/pop. "quota" to grow to 5 pop. Therefore, one would conclude whipping at 3 pop., down to 2 pop., and quickly (via granary) getting back to 3 pop. is the way to go and I think that's what I'm hearing.

But, am I misunderstanding what a "pop. 3 whip" means? Is the reference for when a city is at 4 pop./pop. 4 and whipping *down to* 3 pop./pop.3?
Because it seems it would be better to be at 4 pop. and whipping because then my whip could be either a 2 pop. whip or a 1 pop. whip. and the pop. bounce-back would still be relatively quick.
 

Abegweit

Anarchist trader
Joined
Aug 6, 2003
Messages
4,878
Location
One step ahead of the authorities
I have always understood a 3 pop whip to refer a whip of three population. That is to go from size 10 to size 7 or from size 6 to size 3. Thus the example given of going from size 4 to size 3 would be a 1 pop whip.
 

lymond

Rise Up! (Phoenix Style!)
Moderator
Hall of Fame Staff
Joined
Mar 11, 2008
Messages
23,793
I've honestly never seen the phrase "pop.3 whips". 3 pop whip is a common practice though to get out settlers fast at size 6 and put decent OF into something like another worker. You have to be Size 6 or higher to 3 pop whip. Size 4 or higher to 2 pop whip, which is also common practice.

1 pop whip is 1 pop whip regardless of the size your city is (min. of size 2).

I believe the person who mentioned "pop3whip" just meant "3 pop whip" or was confused themselves, but I've never seen mention of it myself.

That doesn't mean that 1 popping at size 3 like a granary at the right food fill point is not a good idea. I'd still call it a 1 pop whip.
 

Olson

Warlord
Joined
May 5, 2013
Messages
283
Location
Long Island, NY
I have always understood a 3 pop whip to refer a whip of three population. That is to go from size 10 to size 7 or from size 6 to size 3. Thus the example given of going from size 4 to size 3 would be a 1 pop whip.

That's how I define the two terms, also. Just wanted to be sure. Thanks.
 

Olson

Warlord
Joined
May 5, 2013
Messages
283
Location
Long Island, NY
I've honestly never seen the phrase "pop.3 whips". 3 pop whip is a common practice though to get out settlers fast at size 6 and put decent OF into something like another worker. You have to be Size 6 or higher to 3 pop whip. Size 4 or higher to 2 pop whip, which is also common practice.

1 pop whip is 1 pop whip regardless of the size your city is (min. of size 2).

I believe the person who mentioned "pop3whip" just meant "3 pop whip" or was confused themselves, but I've never seen mention of it myself.

That doesn't mean that 1 popping at size 3 like a granary at the right food fill point is not a good idea. I'd still call it a 1 pop whip.

I don't think I've *seen* it either but it's said frequently in YouTube games and what you wrote is what I have been thinking. The doubt came from hearing the commentary and I thought, maybe, I was missing a slightly diff. whip strategy.

In the YouTube vids and a couple WarAcademy articles, a Pop.3 city min. seems the most disireable (early game REX) and part of my OP was about maintaining a Pop.4 city during early whipping.
 
Top Bottom