60% of europeans think Israel is most dangerous country in the world

[Dr. Dr. Doktor]

Bigfatron.

That is a very easy liberal view on things you have there.
However who have justice on their side? Who will history absolve?

 

[Ozz]

Originally posted by IceBlaZe

Inside the mandate, not part of official Zionist policy, Stern Gang.

Only to gain Britain's and France's support. Israel itself had little interest in the operation.

Bull's assasination? Maybe you mean Count Bernadotte's assasination - which was performed by extreme factions and was never a part of Zionist policy. It was performed by the LEHI ("Stern Group") which did not accept the Authority of the Yishuv's elected leaders.


I wouldn't call that agressive.
It's a pre-emptive defensive measure.

In reaction to terrorism within it's territory.

Yeah, Israeli spies are the first to forge foreign passports...


You show anything but ignorance about the topic.

So, Terrorism is Ok inside the mandate?

Gerald Bull, Mr "Big Frickin' Artillery assassinated by Mossah.
Right, We run major invasions at the drop of a hat too.

Thats what the Japanese said about Pearl Harbour wasn't it?

Again, within the mandate, no casus belli, accordin' to you.

First to get caught, and then to try it again, and get caught again
,morons.

Thanks for the complment, yer so busy double talkin' you can't
even get yer insults right.

 

[IceBlaZe]

Originally posted by Ozz


So, Terrorism is Ok inside the mandate?

Terrorism is never ok.

Gerald Bull, Mr "Big Frickin' Artillery assassinated by Mossah.

Oh, you meant that Bull.
My mind was fixed on Odd Bull, which is why I was surprised to hear he was assasinated.
That action can be seen as agressive.
I think active espyonage is always agressive in that matter.
However, the action is not agressive as part of an agressive policy - it is simply defensive due to the situation.
Israel was never at peace with the Iraqis - and Iraq was the one to put herself in a situation of hostility with Israel when it declared war on it.
If Israel was to defend herself, it can't allow Iraq to have such a strong weapon.

Right, We run major invasions at the drop of a hat too.

It's a major invasion in a local scale, but it's not an agressive action that came for no reason.

Thats what the Japanese said about Pearl Harbour wasn't it?

It doesn't matter who said the same, what matters is the truth within the saying.

Again, within the mandate, no casus belli, accordin' to you.

No, I just don't think limited actions within the Mandate by extreme factions can be considered as agressive Israeli policy.

Thanks for the complment, yer so busy double talkin' you can't
even get yer insults right.

I guess I'm not as a trained offender as you. Shylock rings a bell?

 

[Ozz]

Originally posted by IceBlaZe

I guess I'm not as a trained offender as you. Shylock rings a bell?

It does rythum with Sherlock. If you want to drag up old threads.

Guess I'm not as ignorant as you ASSumed eh.

 

[IceBlaZe]

Guess I'm not as ignorant as you ASSumed eh

No, it was my mistake.