(8-10c) 4UC Celts - Oppidum Change

[Anarcomu]

(8-10) 4UC Celts

This is a thread for discussing the addition of 2 more unique components to the Celtic civilization.

forums.civfanatics.com

Actual Oppidum :

Spoiler :

UI - Oppidum (Great Person Improvement):
Can be built by Great Merchant, Great Engineer, Great Scientist, and Great General. Does NOT replace other GPTIs
+2 Food, +1 all other yields
+100% Defense Bonus for units on tile
allows exploitation of any strategic resource on the tile
adjacency bonuses:
+1 / to Farms
+1 / to Camps
+1 / to Pastures
+1 / to Mines
+1 / to Quarries
+1 / to Plantations
+1 / to Lumber Mills
+1 / to Logging Camps
+1 / to Fishing Boats

New Deal Tenet boost :
+6 production.

Proposal :
Change all adjacency bonuses to : +1 /.
The Oil well, Offshore Platform and Village are excluded (same as original Oppidum).
New Deal Tenet boost change to 2 //

Rational :
Making all adjacency yields on the Oppidum alike, simplify it.
Production is the most common yield amongst all adjacency yield from the Oppidum, and the Celts have a strong faith flavor.
Since the Oppidum is built from 4 GP which provide 3 different kind of yields, and 6 can be divided by 3, I propose to split what New Deal provide to the Oppidum.

 

[CppMaster]

The Oil well is excluded.

Why is that in particular?

 

[Anarcomu]

That's the case with Oppidum right now. Btw should either exclude Offshore Platform too, or exclude neither of them.

 

[Anarcomu]

Updated with removal of Offshore platform and Village, same as original Oppidum

 

[gwennog]

In a notion of simplification you could include all the improvements. It would not fundamentally change anything and readability would be further improved.

 

[azum4roll]

Just give it to all adjacent tiles, regardless of improved or not.

 

[CppMaster]

I think giving it to just improvements is fine, so it's not working too quickly.

 

[azum4roll]

The thing is, unless we make a separate table for boosting ALL improvements, we'll have to list every single improvement in the adjacency table. Which will still break the tooltip.

 

[CppMaster]

The thing is, unless we make a separate table for boosting ALL improvements, we'll have to list every single improvement in the adjacency table. Which will still break the tooltip.

What's the reason not to have this separate table?

 

[hokath]

MAGI: This has the same requirements as the base

 

[Anarcomu]

I didn't mention in the proposal because it looked obvious, but GPTI do not benefit from the adjacency bonus (just to be clear).

 

[Recursive]

Timestamp post to arrange all the threads in a neat order.