(8-WD) Dutch UA reinvention

[Pipiskus]

(8-29) 4UC Netherlands

This is a thread for discussing the addition of 2 more unique components to the Dutch civilization.

forums.civfanatics.com

New UA effect:
Dutch East India Company
Get +2 Trade routes for every Global Monopoly.

Can found an additional corporation for every 13 trade routes. You can found your first corporation at Banking(except from Hexxon refinery)
International Trade routes yield Food and Production to its owner (you) as if they were internal (being affected by internal trade route modifiers as well as international) .

Resources from City-States count toward Global Monopolies, and City state allies grant double the amount of luxury resources. Improving city state's resource will place an additional luxury resource you don't have a monopoly with (from the ones present on the map).

P.S Probably too much of everything, leave your comments

 

[azum4roll]

There's already a (8-29b).

What happens when you lose a monopoly?

CS giving double luxury amounts does absolutely nothing unless you have Statecraft, so this UA forces you into a policy tree.

Improving city state's resource will place an additional luxury resource you don't have a monopoly with (from the ones present on the map).

Place where?

 

[Pipiskus]

There's already a (8-29b).

What happens when you lose a monopoly?

CS giving double luxury amounts does absolutely nothing unless you have Statecraft, so this UA forces you into a policy tree.


Place where?

We were writing this at the same time probably
You should lose 2 trade routes while not losing the trade units themselves, they must be revoked from their mission at this period of time.
Yeah, you are right, i probably should add this to the UA
Where it possible, place mine resources on the hills, place plantation resources in jungles and plains, place corals and whales at the coast, etc.

 

[hokath]

Resources from City-States count toward Global Monopolies
Already exists in Statecraft

 

[Pipiskus]

Resources from City-States count toward Global Monopolies
Already exists in Statecraft

Well yeah, but then it would not work for some time. I dont know if it's good or bad if this Ua will force players to go into Statecraft, are they not already doing that anyway? Iam lost and don't know what to do here tbh. It sounded good at first

 

[Rekk]

This UA is much too long.

 

[Nightmare Dusk]

True, while i think you could have something going here, it needs to be cut down a bit to fit the ingame description box for the UA

 

[hokath]

@Pipiskus
1) When you edit you need to make a post saying what you changed
2) Is that over the deadline...? :ramkahmmmmmm:

 

[Pipiskus]

@Pipiskus
1) When you edit you need to make a post saying what you changed
2) Is that over the deadline...? :ramkahmmmmmm:

I changed the phrasing of this:
We also need to move yields from corporate benefits to buildings you can get at renaissance or earlier , in order for it to work as intended

I wrote about headquarters yields when i was thinking about corporate benefits actually

 

[hokath]

Can found an additional corporation for every 13 trade routes. You can found your first corporation at Banking(except from Hexxon refinery)

This part was new.

I think you might want to just wait for next congress with this, it needs more thought

 

[Pipiskus]

This part was new.

I think you might want to just wait for next congress with this, it needs more thought

No i wrote this at the night at 23:00 , you can look up discord, but yeah, i agree it could have been better, its not like this gonna win, i just wanna see how much votes it can get and if people are interested

 

[hokath]

We also need to move yields from corporate benefits to buildings you can get at renaissance or earlier , in order for it to work as intended

You can't have this part. The proposal must be fully specified.
Would you like me to remove it or withdraw?

 

[Pipiskus]

You can't have this part. The proposal must be fully specified.
Would you like me to remove it or withdraw?

I will remove it by myself

 

[hokath]

MAGI:
This needs base proposal requirements +
Extra corporation per X trade routes trait column
Early corporation at Tech trait column
Combined trade routes effect trait column

 

[Pipiskus]

@hokath , I changed my mind, you can withdraw

 

[Recursive]

Timestamp post to arrange all the threads in a neat order.