[Vote] (9-49) Manufactory and Academy Changes

[azum4roll]

ResourceExtractionMod is an unused vanilla column that's not implemented, and would not be suitable for +1 strategic anyway.

And IMO it should only work for strategics, not luxuries. I don't want to make lesser (non-regional) monopolies easily available.

 

[FPXI]

I'm with @azum4roll. This should only work on strategics.

 

[pineappledan]

I’m happy to change to that if that’s what gets it sponsored

 

[KungCheops]

I can sponsor possible DLL parts to this.
A comment: isn't getting +1 strategic quite a bit weaker than getting +1 lux? Imo it could be doubling strategic output. But maybe that's too strong.

 

[hokath]

It would be good to implement ResourceExtractionMod in either case, since its there in the database
I agree +1 Strategic is kinda weak, but maybe 50% increase is best. Making this column only work on Strategics.

Then if we also did Improvement_ResourceExtractionIncrease (ImprovementType, ResourceType, Num)
(working on all resources)
We could do the +1 Strategic easily and change it later if its found to be weak

p.s. I sponsor the database part and text

 

[pineappledan]

It depends on the situation.
Additional copies of Luxuries aren’t that useful unless they can flip a monopoly.
1 more copy of a strategic has more uses but it is less likely to flip a monopoly.

Ultimately the choice is tThe players for what they value.

Or as I said, if it’s limited to only strategics then that’s a call you can make as a condition of sponsorship

 

[usadefcon1]

What was decided? +1 on top of Strategic only?

 

[pineappledan]

No consultation happened with a sponsor, so it's both strategic and luxury.
This proposal was sponsored as written in the OP

 

[Recursive]

Timestamp post to arrange all the threads in a neat order.