RedRalph
Deity
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2007
- Messages
- 20,708
from guardian
I thoguth they were going to specifically avoid doing this sort of thing now? Is it worth immolating 40 civilians to get those Talebs? Don't they know the brothers, fathers and sons of the civilians are probably joining the Taliban as we speak? Idiots
At least 90 people, including 40 civilians, have been killed in northern Afghanistan after Nato launched an air strike on two fuel tankers hijacked by the Taliban, officials said today.
Militants seized the two trucks, which were delivering jet fuel to Nato forces, around midnight. The alliance launched the strike in Kunduz province as the Taliban fighters tried to drive the vehicles across a river, the police chief Gulam Mohyuddin said.
Afghan officials said the attack had killed 90 people, including 40 civilians. The provincial governor, Mohammad Omar, told Reuters the dead included villagers who had gathered to collect fuel from the tankers.
Nato confirmed there was an air strike in Kunduz overnight.
Lieutenant Commander Christine Sidenstricker, press officer for the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf), said Nato aircraft spotted the hijacked lorries on a river bank.
"After observing that only insurgents were in the area, the local Isaf commander ordered air strikes which destroyed the fuel trucks and killed a large number of insurgents," she said.
"The strike was against insurgents. That's who we believe was killed. But we are absolutely investigating [reports of civilian deaths]."
Asked how pilots could know whether a crowd gathered around the truck included civilians or fighters, she said: "Based on information available at the scene, the commanders believed they were insurgents."
A Taliban spokesman told the BBC its fighters had stolen the two Nato fuel tankers, which then got stuck, although he did not say how.
The Taliban decided to empty the tankers and local people arrived to take some of the fuel, he said.
At that point the air strike took place, causing a hugh explosion.
The incident could reignite anger with foreign troops over civilian casualties. It comes two months after the new commander of US and Afghan forces in the country, General Stanley McChrystal, announced measures to reduce civilian casualties, which he said were undermining the war effort.
One of the tanker drivers told the BBC two of his colleagues had been beheaded when the Taliban carried out the hijacking.
AFP reported that seriously burned people were crowding a hospital in Kunduz.
Omar told the Associated Press that the dead included the senior Taliban commander for the district, Abdur Rahman, and four Chechen fighters.
"Abudur Rahman is a very dangerous man," he said.
The incident occurred 1.2 miles (2km) from the village of Omar Khel, officials said.
McChrystal's tactical directive followed intense criticism of Nato air strikes by the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, and others earlier this summer. The controversy was fuelled by a report from the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan that said coalition air strikes were responsible for nearly a third of the 1,013 civilian deaths during the first half of the year. The report found that Taliban landmines and suicide bombers were responsible for 59% of civilian casualties during those six months.
I thoguth they were going to specifically avoid doing this sort of thing now? Is it worth immolating 40 civilians to get those Talebs? Don't they know the brothers, fathers and sons of the civilians are probably joining the Taliban as we speak? Idiots

