• 📚 A new project from the admin: Check out PictureBooks.io, an AI storyteller that lets you build custom picture books for kids in seconds. Let me know what you think here!

90, including 40 civilians, killed by NATO strike in Afghanistan

RedRalph

Deity
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
20,708
from guardian

At least 90 people, including 40 civilians, have been killed in northern Afghanistan after Nato launched an air strike on two fuel tankers hijacked by the Taliban, officials said today.

Militants seized the two trucks, which were delivering jet fuel to Nato forces, around midnight. The alliance launched the strike in Kunduz province as the Taliban fighters tried to drive the vehicles across a river, the police chief Gulam Mohyuddin said.

Afghan officials said the attack had killed 90 people, including 40 civilians. The provincial governor, Mohammad Omar, told Reuters the dead included villagers who had gathered to collect fuel from the tankers.

Nato confirmed there was an air strike in Kunduz overnight.

Lieutenant Commander Christine Sidenstricker, press officer for the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf), said Nato aircraft spotted the hijacked lorries on a river bank.

"After observing that only insurgents were in the area, the local Isaf commander ordered air strikes which destroyed the fuel trucks and killed a large number of insurgents," she said.

"The strike was against insurgents. That's who we believe was killed. But we are absolutely investigating [reports of civilian deaths]."

Asked how pilots could know whether a crowd gathered around the truck included civilians or fighters, she said: "Based on information available at the scene, the commanders believed they were insurgents."

A Taliban spokesman told the BBC its fighters had stolen the two Nato fuel tankers, which then got stuck, although he did not say how.

The Taliban decided to empty the tankers and local people arrived to take some of the fuel, he said.

At that point the air strike took place, causing a hugh explosion.

The incident could reignite anger with foreign troops over civilian casualties. It comes two months after the new commander of US and Afghan forces in the country, General Stanley McChrystal, announced measures to reduce civilian casualties, which he said were undermining the war effort.

One of the tanker drivers told the BBC two of his colleagues had been beheaded when the Taliban carried out the hijacking.

AFP reported that seriously burned people were crowding a hospital in Kunduz.

Omar told the Associated Press that the dead included the senior Taliban commander for the district, Abdur Rahman, and four Chechen fighters.

"Abudur Rahman is a very dangerous man," he said.

The incident occurred 1.2 miles (2km) from the village of Omar Khel, officials said.

McChrystal's tactical directive followed intense criticism of Nato air strikes by the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, and others earlier this summer. The controversy was fuelled by a report from the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan that said coalition air strikes were responsible for nearly a third of the 1,013 civilian deaths during the first half of the year. The report found that Taliban landmines and suicide bombers were responsible for 59% of civilian casualties during those six months.

I thoguth they were going to specifically avoid doing this sort of thing now? Is it worth immolating 40 civilians to get those Talebs? Don't they know the brothers, fathers and sons of the civilians are probably joining the Taliban as we speak? Idiots
 
I thought NATO jet fighters have the technology to separate civilians from guerillas. :p
 
Hooray justice....
 
Shouldn't the title be:

90 killed, including 40 civilians, by Taliban attempting to distribute jet fuel stolen from NATO forces.

?

Unless, of course, you do not consider the Taliban to be legitimate targets or suspect that they did not KNOW they would be struck...

Is this really any different than Hamas using human shields/planted "civilians"?
 
We're also not sure who they we're aiming at.:p

Wait, who's aiming at who? :p

...

Anyways, in a war, in any armed conflict, civilians will get killed. Smart bombs doesn't change that, as this sort of thing shows us, time and time and time again and again and again.
 
Shouldn't the title be:

90 killed, including 40 civilians, by Taliban attempting to distribute jet fuel stolen from NATO forces.

?

Unless, of course, you do not consider the Taliban to be legitimate targets or suspect that they did not KNOW they would be struck...

Is this really any different than Hamas using human shields/planted "civilians"?

No, it shouldn't.
 
The Taliban steals jet fuel from NATO and gathers a bunch of civilians around the trucks...

But they are not to blame...

Amazing.
 
The Taliban steals jet fuel from NATO and gathers a bunch of civilians around the trucks...

But they are not to blame...

Amazing.

Yeah, even Fox news isnt trying to spin it that way Eco, so you really are barking up the wrong tree with this. Honestly, do you think anyone is stupid enough to fall for that?
 
The Taliban steals jet fuel from NATO and gathers a bunch of civilians around the trucks...

But they are not to blame...

Amazing.

If I steal your wallet, run off to some people and start giving out the money within it, and a cop shoots me and all those people, the cop is to blame for the civilian deaths.

Granted, the Taliban share the blame, but the cause was the NATO air strike.
 
Why do people want to equate law enforcement with war?

When muslim terrorists intentionally gather people at strike locations, as they do in Israel, bad things happen. What's new?
 
Why do people want to equate law enforcement with war?

When muslim terrorists intentionally gather people at strike locations, as they do in Israel, bad things happen. What's new?

This is just moronic.
 
Why do people want to equate law enforcement with war?

This was a cause-and-effect issue. The NATO strike is what killed the civilians, even though the Taliban are to blame for them being there in the first place. The current title is accurate.
 
Back
Top Bottom