1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

A fun thought-experiment: Not ten unique numbers, but twelve

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Terxpahseyton, Mar 29, 2011.

  1. Terxpahseyton

    Terxpahseyton King, Warrior, Prophet, Magician, Lover

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,158
    We all know how it goes from 1 to 9. After that, a repetition of symbols begins and we deal with 1+Z-digit numbers (lets leave numbers beyond of Z out of it for the sake of not encouraging nit-pickers).
    I assume this point is chosen because two hands have 10 fingers, so it makes sense that the biggest number we can most easily form in an symbolic way is the number most easiest to use for addition, subtraction, multiplication and division and which by that sort of is the skeleton of primary calculations, I suppose anyway.

    But what if we had 12 fingers? Would we have two more unique number-symbols and would the two-digit numbers begin with 13? Would it make any difference except of course having different number-names and having bigger "intervals" between the "bones" (formerly 10, now 13) of simple calculation?

    I guess what this hypothetical comes down to is: Has the number 10 as the "skeleton"-number any mathematical justification or is just an arbitrary choice caused by the number of our fingers? Right now it seems so to me and I find it fascinating how weird it still seems when I try to actually imagine it.
     
  2. PeteAtoms

    PeteAtoms FormulaRandom

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Messages:
    3,722
    Location:
    Land of Ooo
    So the Decimal (Base 10) vs Duodecimal (Base 12) system thread?

    From Wikipedia:

     
  3. Dachs

    Dachs Hero of the Soviet Union

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    32,588
    Location:
    Moscow
    You know, in theory, some ancient 'Germanic' groups counted in base 12. Entertaining coincidence that SiLL brought it up.
     
  4. emzie

    emzie wicked witch of the North

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    20,797
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    I find it really really hard to think outside of base-10. For the longest time, well into university, I didn't realize base10 was arbitrary and there's nothing special about 10.

    Dunno about Scandanavian languages, but English and German have the same pattern, where we have unique names for 11, 12 and then 13 starts with the rehashing of 1-9.

    eleven / elf
    twelve / zwolf
    thirteen / dreizehn
     
  5. civ_king

    civ_king Deus Caritas Est

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    16,368
    Chinese is definitely base 10
    1 一
    2 二
    3 三
    4 四
    5 五
    6 六
    7 七
    8 八
    9 九
    10 十
    11 十一
    12 十二
    13 十三
    。。。
    20 二十
    21 二十一
    。。。
    30 三十
    。。。
    100 一百
    101 一百一
    。。。
    200 二百
    1000 千
    10000 万
     
  6. GamezRule

    GamezRule Inconceivable!

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    8,654
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Michigan
    I would like to see this in action. How would you write 367326 in a duodecimal system?
     
  7. Defiant47

    Defiant47 Peace Sentinel

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    5,602
    Location:
    Canada
    I consider "ten" or "10" to be according to the base used.

    So I will call 2 in binary "10" or "ten". Or 16 in hexadecimal "10" or "ten".

    So basically, if we had 12 fingers and developed a duodecimal system, then we'd still have 10 fingers. :p
     
  8. emzie

    emzie wicked witch of the North

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    20,797
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    1586A6

    Where A is an arbitrary symbol like 0-9 are.

    edit: there are calculators that do the conversion for you, one which I used for that.

    It's really hard for me to even try and think outside of Base 10. Understanding light is a wave/particle is easier.
     
  9. PeteAtoms

    PeteAtoms FormulaRandom

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Messages:
    3,722
    Location:
    Land of Ooo
    For any other questions like that, online conversion tools for different Base N systems are easily found online:

    Here's one,
    and another.

    EDIT:
    @Arwon - Shi-shah-shah!, lol.
     
  10. Arwon

    Arwon

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Messages:
    18,260
    Location:
    Canberra
  11. Terxpahseyton

    Terxpahseyton King, Warrior, Prophet, Magician, Lover

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,158
    Well PeteAtoms's wikipedia article disagrees.
    However, according to the same article
    Weird, why would that be?
    Ah so it seems to be true. Neither did I, just arrived at this conclusion by coincidence while thinking about how people believe in structures as something universally given - I assume a result of a natural mechanism to accept authority which proved tribes with strength so they survive. And yes, it is freaking hard. Which is what makes it so much fun. It feels like a very vivid example of how human thinking is inherently flawed if you define such a hard-to-overcome bias as a flaw.

    @civ_king

    I realize the sarcastic nature of your reply, but it failed.
    You will notice that only until 9 unique symbols are used and only 100, 1000 and 10000 introduce new ones, which happen to be different versions of 10 multiplied with itself.

    But this reminds me of an article in a news magazine I read where it was said that Chinese people's brain dealt with mathematics in very different ways compared to Western people because of the different way their language deals with mathematics (though civ_king failed to outline said difference).
     
  12. PeteAtoms

    PeteAtoms FormulaRandom

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Messages:
    3,722
    Location:
    Land of Ooo
    Is zero "0" not a number? Aren't there 10 unique symbols?

    Doesn't '10' represent the base value in the system +0 in all systems?
     
  13. Integral

    Integral Can't you hear it?

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,021
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    I have a particular affinity for base-16; my old TI in middle school had options for binary, octal, and hex bases along with the usual base-10.

    Despite that, base-16 is a bit hard to work with in my head. Base=2, on the other hand, is nice and fun.
    0 -> 0
    1 -> 1
    2 -> 10
    3 -> 11
    4 -> 100
    5 -> 101
    6 -> 110
    7 -> 111
    8 -> 1000

    pi = 11.00100100 00111111 01101010 10001000 10000101 10100011 00001000 11010011 (etc)

    edit: base-12 is still the most aesthetically pleasing base.
     
  14. Shadylookin

    Shadylookin master debater

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2002
    Messages:
    6,719
    Location:
    eternal damnation
    binary(bit representation) and hexadecimal(byte representation) number systems aren't uncommon in the field of computer science
     
  15. Earthling

    Earthling Deity

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Messages:
    8,518
    If humans had a different number of digits it is a justifiable speculation that we'd have developed a different base to use rather than base 10.

    There actually is a real reason why base 10 is better than some arbitrary bases - it's the product of two distinct prime numbers. As such, writing many numbers in decimal or fraction forms is easier. A base like base 7, or base 11, etc... would be much more inconvenient.

    Now, this doesn't really make base 10 (2x5) better than base 12 (2x2x3) for instance. But the inclusion of the factor of two is at least useful compared to an arbitrary radix. And because of the sheer convenience of binary number systems and operations it could be argued that octal or hexadecimal is superior though that's with the assumption any hypothetically developed intelligence species would similarly make use of binary, but if humans had say 12 fingers, binary/hex would probably still be worked out the same in all of our technology.
     
  16. Leifmk

    Leifmk Deity

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    3,033
    Location:
    Outskirts of Oslo, Norway
    Yeah, oldschool computer programmers could often (and might still) work faster mentally in hexadecimal than decimal.
     
  17. Kozmos

    Kozmos Jew Detective

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2004
    Messages:
    13,123
    Location:
    Sitka District
    We should all switch to hex so when we merge with computers the transition will go smoother.
     
  18. Leoreth

    Leoreth 心の怪盗団 Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    33,725
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Leblanc
    Didn't the Babylonians also have a base 12 system because they counted on the tips and knuckles of the four fingers of one hand (so without thumb)?

    At least this idea seems widespread enough to have our whole time measurement system built around it.
     
  19. wolfigor

    wolfigor Emperor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,444
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    It seems they used a sexagesimal sistem (base 60): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexagesimal




    The system somehow remains even today: 360 (60x60) degrees in a circle, 60 minutes in a hour, 60 seconds in a minute, 360 days in a year (until we fixed adding the missing days), etc.

    The 12 sign of the zodiac are connected with the Babylonian calendar (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_calendar).

    [Curious enough, also a 7 days week comes from the Babylonians "Counting from the new moon, the Babylonians celebrated the 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th as "holy-days", also called "evil days" (meaning "unsuitable" for prohibited activities)"]

    It's funny to see how some arbitrary decisions takes thousands of years ago still bind us today.

    Base 10 is as arbitrary as any other base (I discovered it in my early teens when I studied binary numbers at school) .
    As a "old school" computer programmer I was "fluent" in base16 as in base10 (until I finished university).
     
  20. Leoreth

    Leoreth 心の怪盗団 Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    33,725
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Leblanc
    From the look of their symbols, it seems to be decimal as well. Would be interesting to know their names.
     

Share This Page