1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Dismiss Notice
  6. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

A question about diplomacy.

Discussion in 'Civ5 - General Discussions' started by Clement, Apr 6, 2012.

  1. Clement

    Clement Layman

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2010
    Messages:
    732
    For me to say that i disliked the diplomacy in Civilization 5 would admittedly be an understatement, however with news of the upcoming expansion i have the question: are there going to be major changes to Civ V's diplomacy?

    Is there likely to be a complete work-over of the diplomatic system or just a minor touch-up leaving the basic fundamentals as they are?

    Thank you for any answers received.
     
  2. apocalypse105

    apocalypse105 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,704
    They promised to rework the diplomacy system and ad religion and espionage.

    BUt if they still have the Same AI who is playing to win then they just behave the same in diplomacy even with all the positive modifiers


    So its hard to tell. However people usally don't make the same mistake again lets hope firaxis is smart enough to do that
     
  3. Greasy Dave

    Greasy Dave Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2010
    Messages:
    320
    I'm worried that it's going to be worse or at best equally crude.

    I read that they'd thrown out the vanilla modifiers and are going to be using shared religion and religion in general to determine modifiers up until the Rennaissance (possibly including the Rennaissance). After that your relations and modifiers will be determined by the policies you share (I have a feeling it's late game policies).

    At the surface level this sounds like it could be an improvement. However it's more likely to mean the removal of one crude diplomatic system for another even cruder and more stereotypical. Civ 4 used religion as the main diplomacy determiner and I personally hated it. The Civ 4 world, in all the games I played, split into two factions, those with your religion and those with the other. No diplomacy was possible with civs outside your faction.(ANd if you're going to tell me that's the way it was in world history, I suggest you go and study real world history and not some oversimplistic generalisation about the Christian/ Islamic confrontations of the medieval period). Outside of that particular and very brief period, there are many, many cases of different societies, countries and empires, cooperating and trading despite religious and/ or governmental differences. To set diplomacy determiners and relationship modifiers based on religion just continues to propagate the mistaken and misleading paradigm of religious intolerance, when in fact tolerance was an equal if not more common occurence. (And I write that as a confirmed atheist, with not a thread of religious belief in my body).

    The only way this new diplomacy will work, is if it doesn't mean a repetition of the "us" and "them" diplomatic relationship. Ie, If it throws up several different groupings of civs based on religion, and diplomacy is possible between these groupings. Alas this is far too complex for what I think Firaxis are planning.

    So, basically,...naah...it's going to suck...believe that, and you won't be disappointed.
     
  4. Haig

    Haig Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Messages:
    1,723
    Location:
    Finland
    Clements, so far I've discovered from articles/interviews:

    Diplomacy changing over eras/history, early eras focused on religion, later eras on ideologies

    AI civs more forgiving, like not holding grudges over wars fought hundreds of years ago

    Research Agreements can be done only with close allies, more reason to have friends with

    I'm sure there's more to come. :)
     
  5. Haig

    Haig Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Messages:
    1,723
    Location:
    Finland
    This isn't true, why would they lose the old modifiers? People will get penalties for backstabbing, and positives from open borders etc.

    Now it's just that there are new plusses and minuses in the form of religion and ideologies (and getting caught when using spies or giving information via espionage to other civs :) ).
    The ideologies are supposed to be Freedom, Order and Autocracy. (Democracy, Communism, Fascism)

    And like I wrote above there's at least one good reason to sign Declaration of Friendship: ability to do Research agreements. I hope there's additional rewards too.

    And I agree with you that in Civ IV the religion was a bit too powerful of a modifier.

    Also I bet that some leaders are more sensitive over religion, Isabella will hate you for being a heathen, and maybe Gandhi loves you for whatever you are.. :c5happy:
     
  6. apocalypse105

    apocalypse105 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,704
    I wonder if they will take a step back from the AI trying to win the game or else to modifiers have no use the AI will still backstab or hate you when you are winning.
     
  7. Camikaze

    Camikaze Administrator Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2008
    Messages:
    26,570
    Location:
    Sydney
    Dennis Shirk talked about some of the diplomacy changes in his interview yesterday with 2K Greg. I can't remember everything he said, but one thing was that the penalty for going for the same victory condition is being removed.
     
  8. apocalypse105

    apocalypse105 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,704
    yes
    and the warmonger penalty has been reworked so you don't get if you are in a defencive war. You olso don't get a major penalty if you conquer a city state in the past several city states will go into permament war against you because of this instead you will get a lot of negatif influence with some other city states if you conquer other city states. So you will have to work as twice as hard to become their friends

    there are olso more modifiers to make friends or to stay friends.

    THe AI olso will forget past actions faster So it will no longer be unhappy the entire game because you did that one thing wrong

    you can find the discussion here :

    http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=458478&page=11
     

Share This Page