1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Photobucket has changed its policy concerning hotlinking images and now requires an account with a $399.00 annual fee to allow hotlink. More information is available at: this link.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  6. Dismiss Notice
  7. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

A question about Musketmen

Discussion in 'Civ3 - General Discussions' started by HotDog Fish, Jun 18, 2002.

  1. HotDog Fish

    HotDog Fish Leftist Loyalist

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,140
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario, Frozen North
    Are the musket men in civ3 using Match Lock or Flint Lock Muskets?
     
  2. Pygzilla

    Pygzilla loser of lost games

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    174
    Location:
    High Desert
    or wheel lock?
     
  3. cracker

    cracker Gil Favor's Sidekick

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,361
    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    Given the choice of building pikemen for 30 shields to get a 3 defense or building musketmen for 60 shields to get a 4 defense, which should you choose?

    Which defense has a higher chance of succeeding: 2 pikemen + a cannon or 1 musketman + a cannon?

    I have gotten to where I rarely build musketmen unless there is a very special circumstance that might warrant it.

    The musketmen animations should also produce significantly large amounts of smoke in the progress of the game because that is one of the biggest features of blackpowder warfare.
     
  4. HotDog Fish

    HotDog Fish Leftist Loyalist

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,140
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario, Frozen North
    I actually don't build musket men, just upgrade my pike men, but ummm...that's really not an answer to my question
     
  5. ETO_Peregrine

    ETO_Peregrine Martinet

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    70
    Location:
    USA
    The musket man (why two words?) replaces pikemen and is replaced by riflemen, so my best guess is that the musket man represents the use of all firearms from hand cannons to mass produced flintlock pieces. The musket man's defense rating suggests he is supposed to be an effective counter to knights, as soldiers armed with early matchlock and wheel lock weapons were intended. The appearance of the musket man also seems to fit in the 16th century, when knights were on the decline. The rifleman is clearly intended to be a 19th century infantryman, so the musket man's mandate seems to span the 17th and 18th centuries, putting him squarely in the flintlock era as well. I would like to see an intermediate unit that represents the offensively capable unarmored soldiers who were equipped with standardized flintlocks. 4/5/1 or 4/4/1 at 60 shields perhaps?
     
  6. Zouave

    Zouave Crusader

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2001
    Messages:
    1,603
    BINGO. You hit the problem right on the nose.

    Firaxis' units (and their values) are simplistic and lame, and here is why.

    The original musketmen (or arquebusiers) carried heavy slow-firing muskets with primitive wheellocks or matchlocks. They could not carry bayonets.

    THUS, pikemen and musketmen FOUGHT TOGETHER, such as in the famous Spanish tercios (which should be the Spanish UU). The muskets supplied firepower, and the pikemen held off knights.

    In the early 18th century BAYONETS were able to be easily fitted to muskets, which then used the better flintlock system. Pikemen became instantly obsolete, and musketmen more offensive, even though cannon were Napoleon's prime mover offensively.

    So with Civ 3 we do not have the AI using cannon offensively, nor do we have advanced musketmen at all. In fact, all of Firaxis' post-gunpowder units have absurdly low values, that owing to some artificial nonsense about trying to give civs without needed resources "a chance". Civ 3's resource appearance rates are also ridiculously low.

    The best we can do about this is mod the game. See either Plutarck's LWC mod, or the one I posted, on the Complete Mods forum. Both have the two types of musketmen - primitive and advanced.
     

Share This Page