Xyael
Trade routes enthusiast
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2025
- Messages
- 104
Hi,
I come to you because I had a hard time seeing the point with some civs, which I naturally find below the others.
These are civilizations with too big an environmental bias, often producing more food in these environments to do nothing with it afterwards. These civilizations are often expansionist but objectively given their biases their expansion is limited. I don't put coastal civilizations in the lot, because coastal tiles are easy to find, coastal civilizations even have a small advantage in the age of exploration and often do better than giving food.
So I don't know, have you seen an advantage, possible combos taking them out of their environmental biases to these civilizations like Egypt, Mississippi, Shawnee or the Incas?
I come to you because I had a hard time seeing the point with some civs, which I naturally find below the others.
These are civilizations with too big an environmental bias, often producing more food in these environments to do nothing with it afterwards. These civilizations are often expansionist but objectively given their biases their expansion is limited. I don't put coastal civilizations in the lot, because coastal tiles are easy to find, coastal civilizations even have a small advantage in the age of exploration and often do better than giving food.
So I don't know, have you seen an advantage, possible combos taking them out of their environmental biases to these civilizations like Egypt, Mississippi, Shawnee or the Incas?