How are you enjoying yourself so far?I have been reading these boards for years and this was the thread that finally made me register.
I have been reading these boards for years and this was the thread that finally made me register.
It is wholly disgusting to me that a people who profess Christian values have such vitriol for people who do not share their views. You do not have love in your hearts. We have heard these arguments before and they have been used repeatedly to demonize and dehumanize oppressed minorities. Rhetoric like the kind being espoused in this thread should be classified as nothing less than hate speech.
How dare you make blanket statements about the people close to me. My mother is a lesbian and I am a rape baby. I am straight and married. How dare you tell me that gays lead to dissolution of the family unit. How dare you tell me that gays can't be loving people/parents. How dare you tell me gays can't teach family values.
Most importantly, how dare you try to tell me whom I can and cannot love or whom my children can or cannot love.
People are gay. Get over it.
So you agree that homosexuality is natural?
So every thing that happens in nature is good?
Perhaps Cameron is a closet nihilist?Telling someone that they are destroying society is obviously a compliment
Did I say that?So every thing that happens in nature is good?
Yeah. He just said the gay is detrimental and ultimately destructive to so many of the foundations of civilization. What's the big deal?
It's not like anyone should ever get mad because someone said something bad about Christianity or religion in general.
And fwiw, Piers Morgan has come out to say that Kirk Cameron was brave for honestly expressing his opinion the way he did. Obviously, while he may disagree with the comments, he didnt find them 'vitrolic and full of hate' either.
He's definitely in the closet about something, Traitorfish.
I don't think that statements like "gay marriage is wrong", or "homosexuality is immoral" are particularly vitrolic. "It's a threat to the civilization's foundations", however, is a different issue. It's definitely vitrolic, though not sure about it being hate speech ("homosexuals are a threat..." would definitely be hateful, though). I don't like the "brave defenders of CIVILIZATION!!!!" types. There's a destructive hysteria involved in their rhetorics.You see, these kind of comments make Kirk Cameron appear to be as bad, if not worse than those hate mongers over at the WBC. Thats simply not the truth. Again, listen to the interview. It simply was not 'vitrolic', nor was it anywhere akin to hate speech.
Indeed! So drop the "homosexuality is bad because it's not natural" argument.So every thing that happens in nature is good?
I dont think so. Those types are usually quite the hate mongers. Kirk Cameron? Not so much.
As I said in an earlier reply to you, I didn't see the interview. I don't know if it was or wasn't. I don't care.Did you find the interview 'vitrolic and full of hate'?
I didnt. Did you?
And fwiw, Piers Morgan has come out to say that Kirk Cameron was brave for honestly expressing his opinion the way he did. Obviously, while he may disagree with the comments, he didnt find them 'vitrolic and full of hate' either.
I tend to believe that people who espouse the belief that certain groups* (historically ranging from Jews, Muslims, Catholics, Blacks, Asians, Homosexuals, Natives etc) as being destructive to society, to be pretty hateful and also hate mongers.
As I said in an earlier post I didn't see the interview. I don't know if it was or wasn't.
I know you're going to have a hard time contextualising that remark I posted in a way that I'd find anything less than distasteful, and certainly not brave.
But his beliefs are stupid. What's admirable about sticking to your guns when it turns out that they're not actually guns, but bits of partially-chewed toffee?I dont think so. Those types are usually quite the hate mongers. Kirk Cameron? Not so much. He's just a guy thats not about to water down his faith simply to appease political correctness. Good for him.
But his beliefs are stupid. What's admirable about sticking to your guns when it turns out that they're not actually guns, but bits of partially-chewed toffee?
Just as if I said "Judaism undermines the foundation of society" says nothing about Jews.Again, context. He wasnt referring to a 'group' but to a 'behavior'. Lets at least keep what he said in its correct context instead of making it something he never said.
So believing the laws of some bronze-age mystics is the literal word of a cosmic jewish zombie isn't a special belief?I disagree his beliefs are stupid, but again, I actually watched the interview.