Well, we are definitely not in agreement, then.Yeah. Normally I'd stay away from time travel stuff, but these were surprisingly well written in that regard.
I love time travel stories, love the concept of the DTI and the Timeship Relativity (in one of my musings of post-Endgame Voyager, I had this idea that Seven of Nine would be recruited as an agent, based in the 24th/25th centuries - of course this was long before anyone conceived of that pile of crap that is the Picard series).
What I don't love are these particular novels and Christopher Bennett. I found his writing to be dry, uninteresting, and gave up within half a dozen pages. That's not good when it comes to Star Trek tie-in novels. I gave more of my attention to the really awful ones (anything by Diane Carey is generally acknowledged to be poorly-written crap, and the reason she was chosen to write them is because she could churn them out quickly; her final novel crossed a number of lines, though, and she was dropped from the stable of Trek tie-ins).
And I've interacted with Bennett too many times on TrekBBS to recommend him as someone to give $$ to. He's a condescending jerk who has a pathological need to be Absolutely Right all the time, about everything, even when he's 100% wrong.
His rudeness got him banned from my Trek bookshelves. I kept the ones I already bought, but it's been over a decade since I last bought anything he wrote.