America: Y ur peeps b so dum?

FriendlyFire

Codex WMDicanious
Joined
Jan 4, 2002
Messages
21,761
Location
Sydney
AMERICA: Y UR PEEPS B SO DUM?

If you hang out much with thinking people, conversation eventually turns to the serious political and cultural questions of our times. Such as: How can the Americans remain so consistently brain-f[censored]? Much of the world, including plenty of Americans, asks that question as they watch U.S. culture go down like a thrashing mastodon giving itself up to some Pleistocene tar pit.

As William Edwards Deming famously demonstrated, no system can understand itself, and why it does what it does, including the American social system. Not knowing s[censored] about why your society does what it makes for a pretty nasty case of existential unease. So we create institutions whose function is to pretend to know, which makes everyone feel better. Unfortunately, it also makes the savviest among us -- those elites who run the institutions -- very rich, or safe from the vicissitudes that buffet the rest of us.

Directly or indirectly, they understand that the real function of American social institutions is to justify, rationalize and hide the true purpose of cultural behavior from the lumpenproletariat, and to shape that behavior to the benefit of the institution's members. "Hey, they're a lump. Whaddya expect us to do?"

Doubting readers may consider America's health institutions, the insurance corporations, hospital chains, physicians' lobbies. Between them they have established a perfectly legal right to clip you and me for thousands of dollars at their own discretion. That we so rabidly defend their right to gouge us, given all the information available in the digital age, mystifies the world.

Two hundred years ago no one would have thought sheer volume of available facts in the digital information age would produce informed Americans. Founders of the republic, steeped in the Enlightenment as they were, and believers in an informed citizenry being vital to freedom and democracy, would be delirious with joy at the prospect. Imagine Jefferson and Franklin high on Google.

The fatal assumption was that Americans would choose to think and learn, instead of cherry picking the blogs and TV channels to reinforce their particular branded choice cultural ignorance, consumer, scientific or political, but especially political. Tom and Ben could never have guessed we would chase prepackaged spectacle, junk science, and titillating rumor such as death panels, Obama as a socialist Muslim and Biblical proof that Adam and Eve rode dinosaurs around Eden. In a nation that equates democracy with everyman's right to an opinion, no matter how ridiculous, this was probably inevitable. After all, dumb people choose dumb stuff. That's why they are called dumb.

But throw in sixty years of television's mind puddling effects, and you end up with 24 million Americans watching Bristol Palin thrashing around on Dancing with the Stars, then watch her being interviewed with all seriousness on the networks as major news. The inescapable conclusion of half of heartland America is that her mama must certainly be presidential material, even if Bristol cannot dance. It ain't a pretty picture out there in Chattanooga and Keokuk.

The other half, the liberal half, concludes that Bristol's bad dancing is part of her spawn-of-the-Devil mama's plan to take over the country, and make millions in the process, not to mention make Tina Fey and Jon Stewart richer than they already are. That's a tall order for a squirrel brained woman who recently asked a black president to "refutiate" the NAACP (though I kinda like refutiate, myself). Cultural stupidity accounts for virtually every aspect of Sarah Palin, both as a person and a political icon. Which, come to think of it, may be a pretty good reason not to "misunderstimate" her. After all, we're still talking about her in both political camps. And the woman OWNS the Huffington Post, fer Christsake. Not to mention a franchise on cultural ignorance.

Cultural stupidity might not be so bad, were it not self-reproducing and viral, and prone to place stupid people in charge. All of us have, at some point, looked at a boss and asked ourselves how such a numb-nuts could end up in charge of the joint.

In my own field, the book biz, the top hucksters in sales and marketing, car salesman with degrees, are put in charge of publishing the national literature. Similarly, ex-Pentagon generals segue from killing brown babies in Iraq into university presidents and CEOs. Conversely, business leaders such as Donald Rumsfeld who fancy themselves as battlefield commanders and imagine their employees as troops to be "deployed," find themselves happily farting behind Pentagon desks. On the strength of having mistaken Sun Tzu's The Art of War as a business text, they get selected by equally delusional national leaders to make actual war on behalf of the rest of us.

Such a thriving American intellectual climate enables capitalist elites to withhold and ration vital resources like health care simply by auctioning it off to the richest. Americans fail to grasp this because the most important fact (that a helluva lot of folks can't afford to bid, and therefore get to die early) never gets equal play with capitalist political propaganda, to wit, that if we give free medical attention to low income cleft palate babies, a wave of Leninism will seize the nation. That is cultural ignorance. We breathe the stuff every day of our lives.

But when Americans too poor to buy health care nevertheless vote to retain the corporate auction process, that is cultural stupidity.

"I may die early eating unidentified beef byproducts soaked in waste chemicals, but I'll die owning a 65-inch HDTV and a new five speed automatic Dodge Durango with a 5.7 L Hemi V8 under the hood!"

Even the threat of toasting planetary life is not enough to shake Americans loose from this disconnect. As Professor Emeritus of Natural Resources and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Guy R. McPherson points out, "79.6% of respondents to a Scientific American poll are unwilling to forgo even a single penny to forestall the risk of catastrophic climate change. Scientific American readers undoubtedly are better informed than the general populace. And yet they won't pay a thing to avoid extinction of our species. Kinda makes you warm and fuzzy all over, doesn't it?"

Let us pray the next generation is a tad sharper.

Take the world recent shaking WikiLeak's "revelations" of Washington's petty misery and drivel, which are scarcely revelations, just more extensive details about what we all already knew. Come on now, is it a revelation that Karzai and his entire government is a nest of fraudulent double-crossing thieves? Or that the US is duplicitous? Or that Angela Merkel is dull? The main revelation in the WikiLeaks affair was the U.S. government's response -- which was to bring US freedom of speech policy firmly in line with China's. Millions of us in cyber ghettoes saw it coming, but our alarm warnings were shouted inside a cyberspace vacuum bell jar.

The WikiLeaks affair is surely seismic to those whose asses ride on the elite diplomatic intrigues. But in the big picture it will not change the way the top lizards in global politics, money and war have done business since the feudal age -- which is to say with arrogant disregard for the rest of us. Theirs is an ancient system of human dominance that only shifts names and methodologies over the centuries. Two years from now, little will have changed in the old, old story of the powerful few over the powerless many. In this overarching drama, Obama, Hillary and Julian Assange are passing players. Watching the sweaty, fetid machinations of our overlords with such passionate involvement only keeps us from seeing the big picture -- that they are the players and we are the pawns.

Still, I for one am in favor of giving Assange the Médaille militaire, the Noble Prize, 15 virgins in paradise and a billion in cash as a reward for his courage in doing damned well the only significant thing that can be done at this time -- momentarily f[censored] up government control of information. But "potentially stimulating a new age of U.S. government transparency," (BBC) it ain't."

GOP honcho Mitch O'Connell says what America needs is for Republicans to finish beating the snot out of Obama, and strengthen the already rich by eliminating taxes for them and shifting the burden onto us. Obama says America needs to find bipartisan cooperation with the party of ruthlessness. Elton John says that America needs more compassion (Thanks, we never noticed).

But broader America is happy in the sense they know happiness as an undisturbed regimen of toil, stress and commodity consumption. Despite the way it looks in the news, most Americans remain untouched by foreclosure, bankruptcy and unemployment. So risking loss of their work-buy-sleep cycle in an insurrection looks to be sheer lunacy to them. Like cows, they are kept comfortable in the pure animal sense to be milked for profit. Animal comfort kills all thoughts of revolution. Hell, half of mankind would be thrilled with the average American's present material situation.

But politics and money are never going to fill what is essentially a public vacuum that is moral, philosophical and spiritual. (The latter was instantly recognized by fundamentalist Christians, disfigured by cultural ignorance, as they may be.) Not many ordinary Americans talk about this vacuum. The required spiritual and philosophical language has been successfully purged by newspeak, popular culture, a human regimentation process masquerading as a national educational system, and the ruthlessness of everyday competition, which leaves no time to contemplate anything.

http://www.joebageant.com/joe/2010/12/america-y-ur-peeps-b-so-dum.html#tp

Jesus help America cause it is in trouble.

I loved hes Book and Blogg (work). Such insights into american culture with hes own frank and dark humour. If your an American (or have an interest) do yourself a favour buy hes book.
 
I fail to see anything in that article is exclusive to Americans. I can't think of any society that doesn't have the same exact things going on with their own flavor based on circumstances.

He mad a "newspeak" reference, thus the article and author should be instantly disregarded.
 
I fail to see anything in that article is exclusive to Americans. I can't think of any society that doesn't have the same exact things going on with their own flavor based on circumstances.
Good point. Several items are global. Some are specifically American.
He mad a "newspeak" reference, thus the article and author should be instantly disregarded.
Now you're speaking absolute nonsense. An article (let alone an author) should never be disregarded. Some are more interesting than others; just like some are closer to the truth than others.
 
We've got no steel industry left, can't educate our young people, can't get health care for our old people, but we can bomb the crap out of your country.

Especially if your country is full of brown people.

We miss you George.

That quote was from 1992...
 
He mad a "newspeak" reference, thus the article and author should be instantly disregarded.
Is the article doubleplusungood?
 
I fail to see anything in that article is exclusive to Americans. I can't think of any society that doesn't have the same exact things going on with their own flavor based on circumstances.

w00t! I agree!!!
 
I like how he takes the opinions of a small minority of people and projects them on the rest of the populace, as if they actually believe that stuff.

EDIT: What we can sum up from this article is that this man is too busy perusing the headlines of the media to actually go out and talk to regular Americans and get their actual opinion on this stuff. Woo for ignorance! :goodjob:
 
This is the United States.

How did we become the largest economy on Earth?

We surely didn't do it because we are all dum.
 
This is the United States.

How did we become the largest economy on Earth?

We surely didn't do it because we are all dum.
Because having the largest economy really has nothing to do with how ignorant and provincial the average American now is? That it really has much more to do with abundant natural resources, a population which used to be generally more educated than its counterparts, and two world wars which destroyed much of Europe?

And not everybody is "dum". The US is now largely a class-based society where even the stupid kids of rich people get the best possible education, while those from poor families typically cannot afford to go to college.
 
This is the United States.

How did we become the largest economy on Earth?

We surely didn't do it because we are all dum.

Well, its like the old saying goes. If we get attacked by a bear, I dont have to outrun the bear...I simply have to outrun you.

Is the US 'dum'?....in some ways absolutely. But in comparison to the rest of the world that still qualifies us to be leader of the pack.
 


You're all just jealous.

 
Frak Joe Bageant. What's with that asinine title. He's an American as well, so why the title making it seem like he's some foreigner looking in? The only conclusion is because he is a self-hating American, so frak him. GTFO and don't let the door hit your ass on the way.

Also cannot help miss the racial overtones, which mark him as an obvious extreme leftist who thinks everything revolves around race.
 
I spent two minutes reading that article. I'm considering suing FriendlyFire and Joe Bageant for the permanent damage to my retinas, cerebellum, and complete waste of time. The psychological damage of being exposed to that kind of stupidity is probably going to require therapy that I want them to pay for as well.
 
I spent two minutes reading that article. I'm considering suing FriendlyFire and Joe Bageant for the permanent damage to my retinas, cerebellum, and complete waste of time. The psychological damage of being exposed to that kind of stupidity is probably going to require therapy that I want them to pay for as well.
Ditto. But I couldn't even make it two minutes.

@FriendlyFire: $5 million dollar check to me, and this topic never happened. :)
 
He does have a serious point though about small reference pools, celebrity culture and the crass commercialisation of every possible thing.
 
Sounds like a typical elitist leftist who puts down heartland americans as beneath him and flashes the race card at every available opportunity.
 
Is degrading someone for being a 'leftist elitest who puts down heartland americans (whatever that means)' just as bad as someone who you view as flashing the race card at every opportunity?

What do you mean by 'heartland americans'? Isn't asserting that one group is 'more american' then another ignoring the ideals of America?
 
Top Bottom