Hahaha, that is great. So true. The Imperial System is fairly backwards, no offense, etc. But then again, I know my hright in feet/inches, but have no idea about my height in metric, even though I live in a Metric country, apparently.
Originally posted by RealGoober Hahaha, that is great. So true. The Imperial System is fairly backwards, no offense, etc. But then again, I know my hright in feet/inches, but have no idea about my height in metric, even though I live in a Metric country, apparently.
I do know my height in Metric units, but there's no point in telling anyone that I'm 1.77m tall when they would have to convert it into Imperial units so they can understand. So I just say I'm 5'11".
Actually the success of the jokes is a testimony to the versatility of the metric system and the universality of the multipliers and sub-mulipliers (tera, giga.....milli, micro). No widely variable conversion factors to worry about is a definite plus to learning and remembering for young school kids. It is only the prejudice of the "oldies" that provide any resistance to its adoption.
SanPellegrinno, just because we have ten fingers, it doesn't mean we should have a base 10 number system, especially when 12 is so much more divisible. ie 10=1*10=2*5, 12=1*12=2*6=3*4. From this evidence I would presume that the imperial system is somewhat more effective for small units.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.