Annoying Civ

[hothead2]

What is with these annoying praticaly dead civ. I am playing as Egypt on huge world map (great map btw) and i have praticly crushed the romans 3 times . but everytime they always seem to put up another city somewere so then i have to hunt them down not knowing were they are. i have pushed them out of italy so they moved to the mid east. i have pushed them out of the mid east so they move down to africia. it is so annoying to see these 1 city civ runing around. shouldnt there be some kind of surrender system so that if they are knocked down to 1 city or something they should surrender.

 

[korusus]

I agree. I had a thread somewhere about adding a Cease-fire/Surrender option instead of just straight forward mutual peace. The only time that that one city thing happened to me was when I was playing a game as the Iriqouis and I tried to take out the Americans really early on and they kept moving their city further south all the way into Florida (on the real world map).

Needless to say I eventually signed a peace treaty, waited until around the turn of the millenium than conquered Miami

 

[Falcon02]

I agree that that gets annoying, but I think the purpose for that is primarily to give the human player a chance to recover when it happens to them. This also gets applied to the Computer. However, once most of the map is taken up I think this stops.

 

[hothead2]

ARGGGGG:aargh3: !!! I demolished the romans in mid east and what do they decide and do, they pop up 2 more cities in the middle of russia!!! So now i have to move my whole conquering force from the mid east into the middle of russia!!! i just wish i could them and get it over with.