Anti-Nazis riot in Ohio

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cierdan, was that a filibuster?
 
Homie said:
Communisto, what happened to tolerance and being open-minded?
I guess that only implies to ideas, groups and people that agree with you.

I'm sorry, but advocating violence and segregation against a race of people just doesn't have merit. You can speak it all you want, but there will always be people there to oppose you. What did ever happen to "never again"? I suppose it was washed away by blood at Rwanda.
 
They do not advocate violence against a race. Learn the facts. In my excursion on a pro-white website with over 1000 people online at one time there NOT ONE person there that I saw advocated violence against ANY ONE let alone any race.
 
cierdan said:
They do not advocate violence against a race. Learn the facts. In my excursion on a pro-white website with over 1000 people online at one time there NOT ONE person there that I saw advocated violence against ANY ONE let alone any race.

I don't agree with racists. Even if they don't wish violence (which I still doubt). Pro-white, Pro-black, whatever, these are all things that hold back unity, I can't agree with them or defend them in any way. Thus, I wouldn't have just sat around and let them march down my street or any near me or the people of all races I know.
 
Communisto said:
Thus, I wouldn't have just sat around and let them march down my street.

So then what would you have done? It seems like YOU are the one who is advocating violence, not them! I mean someone reading what you wrote would reasonable interpret that as a call to stop them by "any means necessary"

BTW media reports say it was mainly gang members who committed violence against the neo-Nazis ... but I don't know how accurate that is since the reports will obvious be biased.
 
cierdan said:
So then what would you have done? It seems like YOU are the one who is advocating violence, not them! I mean someone reading what you wrote would reasonable interpret that as a call to stop them by "any means necessary"

BTW media reports say it was mainly gang members who committed violence against the neo-Nazis ... but I don't know how accurate that is since the reports will obvious be biased.

yes, cause picketing and protesting is violent :rolleyes:. People brandishing a swastika aren't going to get a welcome hug in most places. If there's one thing to be certain of in this world it is that nazism is the enemy.
 
cierdan said:
So then what would you have done? It seems like YOU are the one who is advocating violence, not them! I mean someone reading what you wrote would reasonable interpret that as a call to stop them by "any means necessary"

BTW media reports say it was mainly gang members who committed violence against the neo-Nazis ... but I don't know how accurate that is since the reports will obvious be biased.
"I consider black people as subhumans who shouldn't have the same right as the Aryan superior white race (in which I of course belong to) but I don't promote violence" :rolleyes:
 
Communisto said:
yes, cause picketing and protesting is violent :rolleyes:

so if the picketing and protesting doesn't stop them, then what?

Do you condemn the violence committed against the neo-Nazis or not? They are HUMAN BEINGS.
 
Hey, I agree with you on this one Communisto. But as a Christian I often get tossed this line by people like you: "You are intolerant and close-minded". I find that people who use that line are usually the ones who fit its description. I find that very hypocritical.
 
Marla_Singer said:
"I consider black people as subhumans who shouldn't have the same right as the Aryan superior white race (in which I of course belong to) but I don't promote violence" :rolleyes:

In my excursion to the pro-white website I didn't see ANY person say that blacks are "subhuman." IIRC, I saw the rare garden-variety insult (like "animal" -- but all humans are animals and we talk about how someone "eats like an animal") -- but NO ONE that I saw at least expressed the view that any were "subhuman" (though a point was made that blacks were genetically the closest to chimpanzees while certain South American tribes were the furthest genetically from cimpanzees)
 
cierdan said:
so if the picketing and protesting doesn't stop them, then what?

Do you condemn the violence committed against the neo-Nazis or not? They are HUMAN BEINGS.

Let me put it this way, If i see a kid wearing a swastika on his t-shirt, his face wont look the same after i'm done "communicating" with him. As a person, he is no better than me, but he's a nazi, honestly. Are you to PC to not realise that you are defending nazis?

Homie said:
Hey, I agree with you on this one Communisto. But as a Christian I often get tossed this line by people like you: "You are intolerant and close-minded". I find that people who use that line are usually the ones who fit its description. I find that very hypocritical.

I get that rap as an anarchist too, then they plug their ears when i start to say stuff that makes sense. It gets really old, really fast.
 
cierdan said:
In my excursion to the pro-white website I didn't see ANY person say that blacks are "subhuman." IIRC, I saw the rare garden-variety insult (like "animal" -- but all humans are animals and we talk about how someone "eats like an animal") -- but NO ONE that I saw at least expressed the view that any were "subhuman" (though a point was made that blacks were genetically the closest to chimpanzees while certain South American tribes were the furthest genetically from cimpanzees)
Seriously, do you really believe those craps ?

Moderator Action: Warned for flaming. Flaming removed. Eyrei.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
 
cierdan said:
They do not advocate violence against a race. Learn the facts. In my excursion on a pro-white website with over 1000 people online at one time there NOT ONE person there that I saw advocated violence against ANY ONE let alone any race.

I know what website you're talking about. I took me about 10 seconds to find this post...

Amedeo (White Nationalist) said:
The Jews [Israelites or member of the Israel People]are foreigners in all Gentiles countries. Killing them or taking/destroying their property can be done with impunity -- exactly as the Jews do not owe the Gentiles anything and have historically killed or stolen or lorded over them with impunity. (If a Gentile country applies its laws to protect the Jews, it does so out of generosity... and at its own risk. They have NO RIGHT to seek reddress from any present Gentile country!!!!!!!!!)

How non-violent!
 
Communisto said:
Let me put it this way, If i see a kid wearing a swastika on his t-shirt, he wont look the same after i'm done "communicating" with him. As a person, he is no better than me, but he's a nazi, honestly. Are you to PC to not realise that you are defending nazis?

That sounds like you are saying you would be violent. I feel sorry for you :( Please don't hurt other people.

@marla, I was presenting what THEY said, not necessarily what I believe, ok? I just like to have an open mind... for example I have an open mind about the claim by pro-black people that the black area was deliberately flooded in New Orleans (apparently quite a few of the survivors think that).... I read stuff I don't agree with all the time (like evolution for example)

@Riesstiu, I think your quotation is either not from the website I visited or it is out of context. I was unable to track it down with a google search. No results came up at all. And besides that you've witnessed right above someone right here on CFC saying he would be violent against someone wearing a swastika. Every forum has its "ugly duckling" if you will.

P.S @ marla

I want to be clear that I do NOT approve of "garden variety insult" of calling people "animals" ... I respect all peoples of all races :) including black races and I know France has some black people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom