Alexander's Hetaroi
Deity
I'd support Andalusia in a rotation among other various Northern African civs such as Morocco, Berbers etc.Candid yet likely unpopular: Who would support a Spain-Portugal-Andalusia rotation for Iberia?

I'd support Andalusia in a rotation among other various Northern African civs such as Morocco, Berbers etc.Candid yet likely unpopular: Who would support a Spain-Portugal-Andalusia rotation for Iberia?
Nah, they should have Morocco/Moors as the closest thing to Al-Andalus.Candid yet likely unpopular: Who would support a Spain-Portugal-Andalusia rotation for Iberia?
Berbers is the ideal option:I'd support Andalusia in a rotation among other various Northern African civs such as Morocco, Berbers etc.![]()
Well, yeah, but you can say that about a lot of current series staples.I mean, technically they've *already* not spain in the game Spain - it was not one of the originsl sixteen (plus one) civs from Civ 1.
Also technically, Civ 3 went a year and a day without Spain (added only in Play the World) and Civ 5 nearly two months (added in the Inca and Spain DLC).
So, you know, "don't think they'll ever not have spain in the game"...probably overstating your case a bit,
- Still have two powerfull islamic dynasties who controled part of Iberia.
I dont see what to gain from Morocco or Andalusia when both turn to be less unique than Berbers.
Al Andalus also speaks it's own language, it's a kind of iberic latin similar of nowadays spanish.- Speak their own different language instead of be Arabs 2.0
Al Andalus also speaks it's own language.
Religious freedom but Dhimmies still were highly taxed second class citizens. I think tha if we want to see a pluri-religious civ is better to look for some classical "pagans".I think the reason why people advocate for Al-Andalusia over other civs is because they want something representing the period of time where religious freedom for all monotheists was codified into law and when Cordoba grew almost as large as Constantinople.
Mozarabic was part of the Ibero-Romance languages like Portuguese and Spanish, so one more to the list of Indoeuropean languages the best represented family. Meanwhile Berber languages diverged from others Afroasiatic languages even earlier than most (if not all) Indoeuropean from each other.Al Andalus also speaks it's own language, it's a kind of iberic latin similar of nowadays spanish.
In Civilization VII I would like to see Arabia split up into multiple civilizations, such as the following:
This also has the added benefit of representing three sects of Islam.
- A civilization that represents the first 3 caliphates (Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid). Preferably a Umayyad caliph leading this time around since we have never gotten one before.
- A Sunni based civilization located in the Maghreb and Iberia.
- An Omani civilization with a strong maritime focus.
- The Fatimid Caliphate (I feel like the Fatimids are distinct enough from the previous caliphates to warrant being their own civilization).
I agree, however I don't see the Berbers as recurring every game. At least Morocco in Civ 5 was partly Berber, with their UU, so if it's a rotation in future games I wouldn't mind.Berbers is the ideal option:
- Speak their own different language instead of be Arabs 2.0
- Dihya is a perfect option to cover an underrepresented time range and their pre-islamic culture.
- Still have two powerfull islamic dynasties who controled part of Iberia.
- For Real World Map scenarios a third civ in Iberia is counterproductive.
I dont see what to gain from Morocco or Andalusia when both turn to be less unique than Berbers.
it is not extinct and is possible to reconstruct. Just watch this video there is a dialogue in Mozarabic.(also cuz Mozarabic is extinct and it is impossible to reconstruct it).
it is not extinct
The Fatimids were Shia.