1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Are thermonukes too strong?

Discussion in 'Civ6 - General Discussions' started by Qarnix, Nov 11, 2019.

Tags:
  1. Qarnix

    Qarnix Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2019
    Messages:
    14
    Gender:
    Male
    So after my post about intercepting nukes some weeks ago I played a game of multiplayer with my friends where we ended up with a nuclear war. We all had the knowledge of how to intercept nukes, but the blast radius from thermonukes can still take out a city, as long as you target 2 tiles away from the city. This generated a lot of salt with the idea that "Thermonukes are too strong"

    To prevent a thermonuke, you would need 5 Mobile SAMs per City to protect them fully. And even then, with two thermonuclear strikes, you can target 2 tiles from a SAM, kill the SAM, then target the tile where it stood, and Destroy the city.
    upload_2019-11-11_12-0-26.png

    Things I though of that could maybe fix it are:
    - Give mobile SAMs a intercept radius of 2. (Might be way too OP)
    - A third building in the Aerodrome disctrict that give new build fighter planes an intercept radius of 2. Fighter planes don't intercept Missile Silo attacks and Nuclear Submarine attacks.
    - Less powerfull outring damage. A city in the outerring of the blast will receive half wall and half health damage and only the last building in each hit district will be pillaged. All hit units receive 50HP of damage and all improvements are still pillaged. Contamination also remains the same.
     
  2. criZp

    criZp Emperor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,349
    Location:
    Nidaros, Norway
    I don't see mobile SAM having 2 range as being any overpowered, they can still only shoot once per turn (I'm pretty sure but not 100%)
     
  3. Qarnix

    Qarnix Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2019
    Messages:
    14
    Gender:
    Male
    Im talking about intercept range, doens't neccessarily mean the ranged shot range I think.
     
  4. MrRadar

    MrRadar King

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Messages:
    973
    Isn't this an incentive to develop some kind of in-game START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) between the players? ;)

    I feel that nukes in VI are about right - finally a real Armageddon weapon if used more widely.
    And if you want watertight defense, well carpet all your territory with SAMs
     
    Pure24, Jkchart and Victoria like this.
  5. Victoria

    Victoria Regina Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    10,210
    It is for end of game. No grievances nor war weariness. I quite like it, especially as deterrence does not really work in a turn based game.
    The thread I originally had this conversation in did point out thermo 2 tiles being nasty.
     
  6. Sostratus

    Sostratus Emperor

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2017
    Messages:
    1,454
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Minnesota, USA
    I recall nominating the thermonuclear “creeping barrage” as particularly problematic- from the point of view of there being any pretense of defense.
    If mobile sams had 2 intercept range then at worst you’d paradrop in your spec ops to snipe out one Sam site, then you could start making headway. It’s quite the deal.
    What’s the story on missile delivery vs bombers again? I know nuke subs have a “missile launch failure” animation, but aren’t missiles the better option? (And Civ4 has global range icbms! Talk about MAD!)
     
  7. Lily_Lancer

    Lily_Lancer Emperor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2017
    Messages:
    1,730
    Location:
    Berkeley,CA
    I never use nukes or thermonukes.
    Even one thermal nuke cost 3,000 production and no purchase. That's crazy.
     
    Attakuiu likes this.
  8. Sostratus

    Sostratus Emperor

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2017
    Messages:
    1,454
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Minnesota, USA
    One death robot costs 1500, imo they are the best bargain for what you get. (Maybe tied with jet bombers.)
    But a modern armor army costs ~2000 before the military academy discount. Given how many units/cities a thermonuclear warhead can vaporize, they are quite production efficient. They literally just delete stuff with no counterplay.
     
  9. Tech Osen

    Tech Osen Emperor

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2016
    Messages:
    1,404
    Well, they are kindda OP IRL too.
     
  10. Bitterman

    Bitterman Warlord

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2018
    Messages:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Granada, Spain
    I don't think they need a fix. They're probably overpowered by design, like in real life. Nuclear weapons were never designed to be used in a war like any other asset, but more like a way to totally decimate and destroy the enemy beyond any possible reparation.

    If you are willing to use them, better be prepared for retaliation.
     
    Jkchart and nauberry like this.
  11. Jkchart

    Jkchart King

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2016
    Messages:
    711
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Texas
    This is the first Civ game where I feel Nukes are actually as powerful as they should be (though I do miss the infinite range ICBMs, their destructiveness makes up for it), and they SHOULD be super powerful. Because they are.
     
    nauberry and Sostratus like this.
  12. criZp

    criZp Emperor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,349
    Location:
    Nidaros, Norway
    Yes I mean the intercept range, SAMs do not have ranged attack like artillery does.
     
  13. Sostratus

    Sostratus Emperor

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2017
    Messages:
    1,454
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Minnesota, USA
    I'm glad they can at least delete a city instead of the older games like civ4 where you had to send in a unit for cleanup of 1 pop, burned out husks.

    That said they had done some nuclear airbursts over navy ships after ww2 and iirc the steel hulls held up quite well. (An underwater test was extremely effective at sinking them though, basically a super cavitation torpedo turned up to 11.) I wonder with a modern metropolis of concrete+steel high rises what the effects of a more moderate warhead (several hundred kt, not multi megaton) would actually be like- the absolute annihilation we saw in japan, where the wood buildings just burned away, or just lots of ruined buildings- but loosely intact- like tokyo after godzilla runs through the place?. It's morbid speculation, but we thankfully just have no real idea of exactly what would happen.
     
    acluewithout and Jkchart like this.
  14. Qarnix

    Qarnix Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2019
    Messages:
    14
    Gender:
    Male
    You can also priority target SAMs with planes.
    But that's just the thing, when i nuked my friend, he became hopeless and useless and couldn't fight back anymore.
     
  15. AsH2

    AsH2 Warlord

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2002
    Messages:
    105
    Location:
    Sweden
    But that 1 pop represent civ4 players sitting in their nuke-proof bunkers.. At least that's how I looked at it, back in the days.. :cooool:
     
  16. WackenOpenAir

    WackenOpenAir Deity

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,194
    Location:
    Eindhoven, the Netherlands
    To make it more real life like, it might be good to have 1 turn delay on them. This way the enemy can have a turn to retaliate and insure mutual destruction.
     
  17. Bitterman

    Bitterman Warlord

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2018
    Messages:
    190
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Granada, Spain
    If he has a couple submarines and/or missile silos, he can retaliate, as far as I know.

    If he doesn't, then the blame is on him.
     
  18. klail

    klail Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2012
    Messages:
    93
    I think gameplay should be more important than realism -- especially multiplayer. I'm still bummed that the esport Civ 6 thing they talked about never came to fruition. I'd LOVE to watch a multiplayer tournament at online speed that was commentated well.

    Maybe the fix is to implement START/treaty mechanics into the world congress that have real bite to them and that can be reliably worked with.
     
  19. TheMeInTeam

    TheMeInTeam Top Logic

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    25,160
    Modern nukes are much stronger than those used in Japan, but the game's representation of nukes is cartoon ridiculousness. Broken in both balance and realism terms.

    A single city in Civ necessarily represents multiple cities IRL. A nuke hitting everything in a 2 hex radius and destroying it is comparable to destroying the entire state of Texas with a single nuke. Yet IRL even a dozen nukes wouldn't completely annihilate Texas. It would screw it over really badly, many people would die and the radiation would be a serious problem (depending on how nukes were detonated). Anything near blast radius would be very unproductive for a long time. But it would not delete all traces of civilization in Texas or even kill every human.

    The Civ 4 representation is actually more accurate.
     

Share This Page