I don't care if it is "easier to see and/or understand"
This is Civ, an epic game of world history, not some little kindergartener, toilet training, have a lollipop, free candy, dumb mobile game that is meant for those who still wear diapers.
It's the same Art Director (Brian Busatti) doing Civ VI that did Civ Rev, so it's not surprising that they look similar.Anyone else draw the similarity?
It's the same Art Director (Brian Busatti) doing Civ VI that did Civ Rev, so it's not surprising that they look similar.
Busatti was definitely on the Civ 5 art team, but Dorian Newcomb was our art director.If I'm not mistaken he is also the same art director for CiV as well.
Spoiler :
I'd say there's a resemblance.
At first I had a knee-jerk reaction and hated the new style but after a little more inspection and analysis it isn't horrible. I could easily get used to it. I like the ships and the mountains . The problem, however, isn't in the stylistic choice, per se.I think the art style is alright and I don't wear diapers. And I've been playing every Civ game since 2. Also, when the developers say it's "easier to understand," in this case they're talking about the new district system and no doubt other systems they plan to implement, which I'd wager don't exactly work as well without making the map easier to understand.
You could argue it's still too "cartoony" either way, but I don't see an inherent problem with wanting it to make it easier to distinguish details on the map.
The trees and farms are similar but the color pallette is more pastel in Rev
how about going and grabbing some screen shots from the console civrev, then placing them side by side with civvi screenshots.
they don't look the same, or even similar.
Wow that's uncanny.Spoiler :
I'd say there's a resemblance.
I don't know how you can say that; the moment I first looked at the new Civ VI screenshots, the very first thing that popped into my mind was "ack, Civ Revolution!"how about going and grabbing some screen shots from the console civrev, then placing them side by side with civvi screenshots.
they don't look the same, or even similar.
Civ VI does look a lot more like Civ IV (and Civ Rev) than Civ V. I think that's part of what's throwing people. They've been playing Civ V for so long that they don't remember how saturated and cartoony Civ IV was.This point always confuses me,
I always felt the CivRev , especially CivRev 2 looks a lot more like Civ4. Both had square titles, and CivRev2 appears to have reused Civ4 terrain assets and had the kind of early 2000s 3D game look.