Now I'm finally ending my first successful game with Austria (my first attempt at 1.0).
I remember that austrian UHVs were different in previous versions (I think there was an UHV related to Defensive Pacts), and I think they should be changed again. Not all of them, just UHV3.
UHV3 Habsburg Domination: Have the Highest score in 1780 AD.
The Score Victory happens just 20 turns after Austrian UHV3, it makes the UHV quite the same of winning by score. It's hard to imagine otherwise, if you have the highest score in 1780, you'll have it in 1800 and win by score. In this game I've achieved highest score around 1500 AD and never lost this position. If you accomplished UHV1 (Conquer lots of provinces) and UHV2 (have 3 vassals), what's the difficulty of UHV3?
Defensive pacts are indeed a bad goal for an UHV: I've never got more then 2, and it seems that after 2 nobody else wants to make a DP with you. We could have something harder.
Of course in 2.0 we could have an UHV related to the Holy Roman Empire, but for now we could make this UHV something more challenging.
Thinking about it, 2 ideas popped up here:
UHV3: Make Vienna (or 1 city) achieve Legendary Culture at XYZ AD
or
UHV3: Have XXXX Culture at XYZ AD
People complained about UHVs lacking religious and cultural sorts. Well, for a civ with a cultural UB it seems more then appropriate. IMO my second UHV draft seems better then the first, as in my game I lack a single Legendary city (even building lots of belfries and cathedrals), but maybe I do lack because I didn't want to make a Legendary city. Playtesting will ensure this.
What do you guys think? I've listened to people complaining about UHVs being overall so militaristic and expansionist, that a cultural one maybe a good option.
I remember that austrian UHVs were different in previous versions (I think there was an UHV related to Defensive Pacts), and I think they should be changed again. Not all of them, just UHV3.
UHV3 Habsburg Domination: Have the Highest score in 1780 AD.
The Score Victory happens just 20 turns after Austrian UHV3, it makes the UHV quite the same of winning by score. It's hard to imagine otherwise, if you have the highest score in 1780, you'll have it in 1800 and win by score. In this game I've achieved highest score around 1500 AD and never lost this position. If you accomplished UHV1 (Conquer lots of provinces) and UHV2 (have 3 vassals), what's the difficulty of UHV3?
Defensive pacts are indeed a bad goal for an UHV: I've never got more then 2, and it seems that after 2 nobody else wants to make a DP with you. We could have something harder.
Of course in 2.0 we could have an UHV related to the Holy Roman Empire, but for now we could make this UHV something more challenging.
Thinking about it, 2 ideas popped up here:
UHV3: Make Vienna (or 1 city) achieve Legendary Culture at XYZ AD
or
UHV3: Have XXXX Culture at XYZ AD
People complained about UHVs lacking religious and cultural sorts. Well, for a civ with a cultural UB it seems more then appropriate. IMO my second UHV draft seems better then the first, as in my game I lack a single Legendary city (even building lots of belfries and cathedrals), but maybe I do lack because I didn't want to make a Legendary city. Playtesting will ensure this.
What do you guys think? I've listened to people complaining about UHVs being overall so militaristic and expansionist, that a cultural one maybe a good option.