1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Photobucket has changed its policy concerning hotlinking images and now requires an account with a $399.00 annual fee to allow hotlink. More information is available at: this link.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  6. Dismiss Notice
  7. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

Axeman Speculation

Discussion in 'Civ5 - General Discussions' started by Tyrvos, Mar 28, 2013.

  1. Tyrvos

    Tyrvos Cu Chulainn

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    Taxachusetts
    With the axeman it looks like it could be a new barbarian unit, a new unit in the tech tree, or possibly a UU of a new faction and they made it a barbarian here just for kicks?

    The thing I find interesting is that the swordsmen next to the axemen have been damaged but not the axemen. Maybe they are a throwing axeman? It's hard for me to identify the character model but it looks like they could be either a native american unit (huron?) or possibly african? Unluckily, these are weak points in my historical knowledge but I've read there were tribes that used throwing axes often from either choice.

    I haven't seen a thread address the axeman specifically, so I apologize if this is a repeat.

    Spoiler :



    Looks like multiple conlusions from others on this thread:
    1) A Barbarian replacement for archers.
    2) An Alqonquian/Shawnee/Cherokee UU with possibly Tecumseh as their leader. Would be kind of like how they combined the Celtic tribes with Boudicca as the leader. Cherokee could be in the Civil War scenario so it could be likely.
    3) Other tribes like Powhatan or Apache.

    All of these seem possible. We need more over analyzing!
     
  2. wilbeard

    wilbeard Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    94
    Location:
    UK
  3. Louis XXIV

    Louis XXIV Le Roi Soleil

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    13,579
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    It's better to discuss it in this thread. It looks like a Tomahawk, so I'd argue it's a Barbarian unit that replaces an Archer.
     
  4. ferretbacon

    ferretbacon Chieftain

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2012
    Messages:
    737
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    North Texas
    I've said it before and I'll say it again: that unit icon is a tomahawk.

    There's also only ten individuals in that group, compared to the twelve you see in most, though it doesn't appear to be wounded.

    Some of you may be aware of my crackpot theory I argued for on another thread. To be brief, I speculated that it might be some sort of new unique unit for an as-yet-to-be-revealed civilization, a unique unit that utilizes a new "privateer" system whereby it disguises itself as a barbarian unit in order to sabotage the expansion of rivals through the capture of rival settlers, missionaries, Great People, trade caravans, and archaeologists, and may additionally wreak havoc to the infrastructure of another civilization through wanton pillaging of road networks, luxury tiles, and strategic resources.

    The obvious downside to this? The unit would be targeted mercilessly by other players, AI, and CSs. Killing it would not declare war. Essentially, it would be a poor idea to try and build an army of these, as they'd be sniped at every opportunity. Better for careful, systematic application.

    Flame me if you will for my baseless speculation and rambling imagination, but I only ask that ye who is without unwarranted speculation cast the first stone. :mischief:
     
  5. Tyrvos

    Tyrvos Cu Chulainn

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    Taxachusetts
    I just think it would be odd to give them the tomahawk symbol specifically and the Native Americanesque character model just to be a barbarian unit. But if it is a barbarian unit, I think you are right that it would replace the archer.
     
  6. cybrxkhan

    cybrxkhan Asian Xwedodah

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    9,687
    Location:
    The Universe
    It just occurred to me - what if it wasn't the unit itself that had the special privateer ability, but the entire civ, as a UA, had some sort of ability like that?

    Though personally that's still a bit farfetched either way in my opinion.

    I'm still leaning towards the idea that either 1) it's from the Civil War scenario and just inserted in nonsensically; 2) it IS a UU, but it doesn't have a barbarian/privateer special ability and the devs just had it as a barbarian unit in the artificial set-up.


    From what we discussed in the other thread, the unit is clearly native american but from the eastern part, and perhaps even more so the northeast. This would lead us to suspect that there could be a northeastern native american civ - but we already have the Iroqouis there. It could be for another eastern native american civ. The Cherokee are a favorite dark horse civ among some here, though to my knowledge the tomahawk was not really used among the southeastern native americans. The tomahawk was used by the Powhatan of Pocahontas fame, though, so it might indicate a Pocahontas-led civilization (though frankly I find that idea as ludricous as the Joan of Arc-led France in Civ III - though very marketable)
     
  7. Tyrvos

    Tyrvos Cu Chulainn

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    Taxachusetts
    That would be a cool idea. Wouldn't the whole privateer system be ruined by the fact it has a tomahawk symbol though, so you could tell where it came from? If you are right though, I think it would be completely fun, creative, and awesome.
     
  8. MaximusK

    MaximusK Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Messages:
    209
    Location:
    New Mexico
    The color scheme looks almost identical to the current color scheme for barbarian units. So I tend to lean towards the unit being a barb, perhaps they've diversified the times of barb units?
     
  9. ferretbacon

    ferretbacon Chieftain

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2012
    Messages:
    737
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    North Texas
    Glad you asked. :D

    I postulated that the unit would appear as a generic barbarian unit to other civilizations and as the UU only to the player controlling it. For instance, in the screenshot above, that tomahawk wielding unit would look like a barbarian Brute to that Assyrian player.

    It wouldn't be totally out of the question that a new unit(s) might have been added to the game, a class of "privateer" units if you will. If that were the case, we might be seeing a unique derivative of that new class.

    Then again that's a staged screenshot and who knows what's actually going on. The only thing I can say with certainty is that unit there is something we haven't seen before.

    @cybrxkhan
    Despite zooming in very close, I am unable to get good detail on it. I still don't think it looks like a member of any western or southwestern tribe, such as the Pueblo would have been, or the Apache, Sioux, Comanche, et al. would be. I don't know why Firaxis would include another northeastern tribe, but that's what it most closely resembles.
     
  10. MaximusK

    MaximusK Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Messages:
    209
    Location:
    New Mexico
    Maybe it is a Native American UU afterall!

     
  11. Tyrvos

    Tyrvos Cu Chulainn

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    Taxachusetts
    The image confused me because my initial impression was that it looked like Hiawatha in game, so I'm thinking you are right on that. I'm trying to think of any other big tribes in New England but the closest I get other than Powhatan are Huron, which I'm pretty sure were more Michigan and north of that. There are ones like Nipmuc and Penobscot around here in New England, but I really doubt it could be any like those.
     
  12. wilbeard

    wilbeard Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    94
    Location:
    UK
    Which tribes would fit that style of dress, that hairstyle, and wield a tomahawk? Are there any candidates diverse enough from the Iroquois?
     
  13. Tyrvos

    Tyrvos Cu Chulainn

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    Taxachusetts
    Ok, that makes it even better. I could also see that with the Ottoman's Barbary Coast UA, since they used a 3rd party for looting and all that. I give you credit for that even if it isn't right in the end, that would be very interesting gameplay.
     
  14. Matthew.

    Matthew. Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Messages:
    2,179
    My limited search resulted in Pawnee, who apparently wore the "mohawk" more often than Iroquois.
     
  15. MaximusK

    MaximusK Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Messages:
    209
    Location:
    New Mexico
  16. True_Candyman

    True_Candyman Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,625
    Location:
    Leicester
    If that is a native american UU, i would bet the civ it's for is the Algonquin. At a push it could be the Powhatan, but come on would they REALLY have Pocahuntas as a leader? :shifty:
     
  17. Louis XXIV

    Louis XXIV Le Roi Soleil

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    13,579
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    Virtually all tribes in the northeast and quite possibly the Atlantic seaboard used them. The word is a Powhattan word, which means it is an Algonquin word. But that could include the Cherokee among many others.
     
  18. Guandao

    Guandao Rajah of Minyue and Langkasuka

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Messages:
    2,937
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New York City
    No! Please let it be untrue! :cry: And Pocahontas wasn't even her real name! (It was Matoaka)
     
  19. ferretbacon

    ferretbacon Chieftain

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2012
    Messages:
    737
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    North Texas
  20. wilbeard

    wilbeard Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    94
    Location:
    UK

Share This Page