1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Dismiss Notice
  6. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

Barbarians overpowered?

Discussion in 'Civ4 - Rhye's and Fall of Civilization' started by Titan_br, Nov 4, 2006.

  1. Titan_br

    Titan_br Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    19
    :blush:
    My first game was very deception. Why?

    I started with Egypt.
    I grow quickly and safe. Around 7 citys, and then a mass barbarians started to attack. they destroyed Rome, Greece, before me die, I changed to French. But we french i could grow, they start to rush me over Spain and Germany.
    Quiet deception, because Russia had a lot of lands to grow.
    I saw Arabia die due to Barbarians. Persia didn't grow over greece for example , I dunno why.

    I dunno why this was happen. I can't see all civ alives until medieval age.
    :nuke:

    PS: I talking about vanilla 1.61 / mod of RC142
     
  2. SilverKnight

    SilverKnight Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2003
    Messages:
    544
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO, USA
    What difficulty was it? The barbs are MUCH harder on the softer civs on the easy level.

    SilverKnight
     
  3. Rhye

    Rhye 's and Fall creator

    Joined:
    May 23, 2001
    Messages:
    9,467
    Location:
    Japan / South America
    yeah i'd like to know the level.
    Barbarians are well balanced in the intermediate one, but I need feedback on the other 2
     
  4. Drogear

    Drogear Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    508
    Location:
    Sweden, Umeå
    I posted an complaint earlier that the barbs (Emperor diff) are very overpowered in the extended 1.42 version of the mod. Played an earlier build (1.38 or somethin) of the original build (on emperor) and I got a feeling that the barbs overran to many AI civs there to.

    I have little trouble with the barbs targeting med (well I can barly handel it actually) but the AI seems to be in much trouble.

    In normal diff everything seems very balanced exept the fact that there is little challenge for a war expansionist human player.
     
  5. Titan_br

    Titan_br Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    19
    This happened on Intermediate level.
    But Emperor was impossible to survive.

    Would be interesting if could be possible to expand Egypt over Africa, because indeed Greece own Egypt in south Mediterraneo, and Rome already got all infrasctruture because Egypt and Greece already did them to high level of development.

    I really wanted to turn off Barbiarians or just put them not so overpowered.
    :cry: How can i do that by myself?


    PS:
    On my games I see french be crushed by Spain or Germany in early years. I think AI is too much agressive for sure.

    I don't see them expanding overseas.
    :scan:
     
  6. Drogear

    Drogear Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    508
    Location:
    Sweden, Umeå
    Just played a game as Rome until earl 1100 cent on emperor. AI civs did not seem to get to badly hurt from the barbarians.

    Out of topic: Culture boarders need to be tooned down, I like the idea that the expanded version got but not as drastic.
     
  7. NitroJay

    NitroJay Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    270
    Location:
    Tecumseh, MI
    Monarch and Emperor's barbarians don't bother me too much. They will usually knock out Rome and/or Greece and almost ALWAYS Persia, but unless I'm playing REALLY badly, I never see them as overpowered.

    I haven't played Viceroy in a while, but I remember that the AI loses to the barbarians MUCH more frequently there. I attributed this to the more agressive AI on higher difficulty levels. I don't think the AI defends itself all that well on the easier levels.

    As for the current version (1.42?), I think the barbarians are fine. It was a real shock to play as Egypt and have the skirmishers attack my southern cities! In every other version, the only thing I've ever seen them do is march north to fortify cities in N. Africa. (Good job, Rhye)

    Anyways, I don't know if the barbarians need anything more tweaked with them, but I've only seen the "barbarians conquer the world" scenario maybe 2 or 3 times. It doesn't happen often enough for me to complain.
     
  8. Drogear

    Drogear Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    508
    Location:
    Sweden, Umeå
    As a freqvent player of rome on emperor level I must say that I really like the way the barbarians are programed to appear in a slow but steady strem in the early years and in hugh bunch at the time of the historical fall of rome. (Same goes for china).

    But the AI controlled civs should perhaps get some bonuses to handel the onslought?
     
  9. NitroJay

    NitroJay Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    270
    Location:
    Tecumseh, MI
    I disagree. I think the AI SHOULD fall to barbarians more often than not. It annoys me when I see Rome building tanks... What I mean is, the barbs are there to recreate the fall of older civs. If I was playing the Romans, I'm pretty sure -I- would hold out. However, AI's Rome should fall when Rome fell. Same for Greece, Egypt, etc.

    If you really want Rome to be around in the modern era (without playing as Rome), just conquer the Roman lands and wait for a revolution.
     
  10. hamtastic

    hamtastic Hamburglar

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    360
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    On the couple games I played on Monarch, I didn't see any civs wiped out by barbs. One of the games I was Japan and the other I was England, and everyone seemed to hold their own.

    When I was Japan I took most of China's land and left China there as a buffer between me and the barbs. :lol:
     
  11. Drogear

    Drogear Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    508
    Location:
    Sweden, Umeå
    Ok very offtopic but could for e.x Rome be programed into transforming into Italy with the apropriate flags and such? That would remove the unhistorical aspect of Rome building tanks as posted before.
     
  12. NitroJay

    NitroJay Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    270
    Location:
    Tecumseh, MI
    The civ name changing has been mentioned a bunch of times before on a few different threads, it's been deemed pretty much impossible... I mean, it happens, Rome, Greece, etc. sometimes survive the barbarians on Monarch and thrive into the modern era, but I don't think this should be the rule. So back on topic, I do not think the barbarians are overpowered. Yes, there are lots of them, but any halfway decent player can protect themselves against them. It is even easier if you know history and when and where the barbarians are going to come from... Keep the hardcore barbarians going, civs like Rome, Greece, Perisa are all destined to fall...
     
  13. Titan_br

    Titan_br Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    19
    My point is:

    1. I Agree Rome, Greece and others should have their power lose due to Barbarians, but they didn't disappear. I think it's not to allow them to expand too much because others civilization will come.
    Without barbarians, I think it's easier to Egypt take all Africa.
     
  14. Magma

    Magma Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    450
    Location:
    Denmark
    Name chaging could be cool. Rome could respawn as the Papal States and Greece as Byzantine. Persia could maybe respawn as the Sasinids(spelling?) or something.

    Empires rise and fall, thats how things goes.
     
  15. Phallus

    Phallus Freudian Slip

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2006
    Messages:
    605
    Location:
    The magical realm of Essex
    The Sassanids were Persians, but the idea has been discussed a lot and sadly it seems impossible.

    Oh wait, NitroJay already said it. Sorry.
     

Share This Page