• 📚 A new project from the admin: Check out PictureBooks.io, an AI storyteller that lets you build custom picture books for kids in seconds. Let me know what you think here!

Be Careful What You Publicly Post Online

Formaldehyde

Both Fair And Balanced
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
33,999
Location
USA #1
There was the recent story posted about town that wanted your online passwords, but I couldn't find it...

More cautionary tales:

http://www.northjersey.com/business/news/Dont_be_a_twit.html

MINNEAPOLIS — Rose McKinney recalls one job candidate who blogged and tweeted herself directly out of a job interview.

This was not an entry-level job or a rookie mistake. The potential job position was a midlevel account manager. The candidate was experienced.

"On paper she looked solid, someone worth talking to," said McKinney, president of Risdall McKinney Public Relations. "But on blog spaces and in Twitter conversations she was negative and critical of other agencies. I imagined what she would say about us and our clients."

Electronic faux pas were once considered the legacy of college students and 20-somethings who would post beer-sodden pictures of themselves and friends on MySpace. But with the rapid advance of Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter from phenomenon to near-obligation for multiple generations, employers are learning that grown-ups can be just as knuckleheaded as freshly scrubbed college grads when it comes to leaving digital impressions.

Amy Langer, co-founder of Salo, a placement firm for the financial services sector, had one job candidate for a controller's position who didn't get the job after the employer took displeasure with a negative political posting on the candidate's Facebook site.

"It's becoming part of the vetting process," Langer said. "It makes sense. Social networking was all about personal posts, but now it's leaked over to the professional side and nobody knows how to handle it."

"The mistake people make is they pour too much of themselves out there," said Gillian Gabriel, a headhunter for advertising and marketing agencies who looks at LinkedIn postings as well as Facebook and Twitter when evaluating prospects. "They talk about personal issues — divorce, sick parents, recovery programs. If someone is having a big issue in life, are you going to take that chance [and hire them]?"

Gabriel said one job candidate with whom she had contact went to her LinkedIn network after she didn't get an agency job and described a scenario where her ideas were at odds with the agency's.

"She made a poor decision," said Gabriel, who was part of the candidate's LinkedIn network. "Not only didn't she get the job but she publicly pegged herself as a bit of a troublemaker."

David Gerwitz, an author who specializes in technology and security issues, said social networkers need to realize that their electronic entries will last for years and years.

"Every tweet, every post is being actively indexed by different search engines," Gerwitz said. "It's going to be available in perpetuity."

Sometimes it may not be what you post, but what someone else posts on your site that causes problems.


Pat O'Donnell, a recruiter and career counselor, said one of her clients, a 45-year-old, $200,000-a-year executive, suffered serious career damage when a boyfriend posted a seminude picture of her on her Facebook page that stayed on the page unbeknown to the executive for three months.

"Everyone sees those pictures," O'Donnell said. "There's a host of things you can't control."

O'Donnell said a survey by the Electronic Recruiter Exchange found that 60 percent of its members checked with LinkedIn as part of the job-checking process.

"I can tell in a flash if someone can sell themselves," said O'Donnell, who referred to LinkedIn as a "business brochure" for honing an image and showing qualifications.

Social networking and use of those sites in the hiring process has become a hot topic among hiring managers. The Minnesota chapter of Human Resource Professionals is devoting its fall meeting in October to the topic.

"The biggest problem is if you are on the Internet with personal information, hiring managers are going to see it," said Donna Ploof, a member of the chapter's board of directors. "If you're bragging about drinking at a party, that might not be a good thing — for yourself or your company."

Hiring managers say they often gain access to Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn through friends of friends. Often a job applicant is already linked to someone at a company where a job is being sought or belongs to professional groups to which an employer already has access.

"In the business of networking, people know people," said Langer. "You have to decide what you want your social media face to be. It's like talking in an elevator. You don't know who's listening."

Of course, I am opposed to all of this. I think your personal life should be just that.

Discuss.
 
I've hired people with flawed online histories. A lot easier to manage someone when you know some of their weaknesses than when you don't.
 
I find it funny that every professional in the article justifies the practice.

They need to be fired.
 
Anytime I post anything to the tubes I assume that it is now public & anyone that cares knows who posted it.

To assume otherwise is just silly.
 
The frightening thing is there's no way to verify if content was even posted by the applicant. What's to stop me from making a fake page of a coworker?
 
Employers often spend about 30 min of each interview trying to get to know me, as a person. They've never hidden that quest for information, it's just that it's become culturally acceptable to hide your personal life from your employer.

If you're going to transmit it, the employer is going to poke around.
 
Next, the quest for them to find out how our genitals really look like will not be hidden.

If you're going to have them, the employer is going to poke around.
 
Someone post that comic... I think it was on xkcd but I can't be bothered to look. It related directly to this. "When did we lose our dreams?" etc.

Personally I don't care if I'm being logged. If I someday get fired for it by someone then good riddance; I'm not going to cater to the whims of some nosy manager on my personal time. Fwiw I think such logs should be made illegal (though I'm not sure how that would work technically).
 
Someone post that comic... I think it was on xkcd but I can't be bothered to look. It related directly to this. "When did we lose our dreams?" etc.

Personally I don't mind if I'm being logged. If I someday get fired for it by someone then good riddance; I'm not going to cater to the whims of some nosy manager on my personal time. Fwiw I think such logs should be made illegal (though I'm not sure how that would work technically).

Make caching social networking illegal? Create a way for one to remove him or herself from caches?
 
Next, the quest for them to find out how our genitals really look like will not be hidden.

If you're going to have them, the employer is going to poke around.

Don't post details of your balls to twitter & facepage & it won't be an issue during the interview?

Just guessing...
 
Next, the quest for them to find out how our genitals really look like will not be hidden.

If you're going to have them, the employer is going to poke around.

If you were an employer, would you check out an applicant's Facebook page?
 
The wife of the new head of MI6 has just made headlines in the UK for posting family details on facebook. Friends even posted messages of congratulations when he got the job. So much for anonymity. Link to article

I always consider anything I post or e-mail etc as being in the public domain.
 
Don't post details of your balls to twitter & facepage & it won't be an issue during the interview?

Just guessing...

Don't log on to snoop other people's twitter and facebook page and it won't be an issue during the interview?

Just guessing...

If you were an employer, would you check out an applicant's Facebook page?

No, I wouldn't. I'm not a calculating bastard who only cares about profit. I'd want people to want to work for me.
 
Next, the quest for them to find out how our genitals really look like will not be hidden.

If you're going to have them, the employer is going to poke around.
If images of them are posted online, a potential employer may see 'em. Not necessarily a deal breaker though.
 
I find it funny that every professional in the article justifies the practice.

They need to be fired.

:clap::clap::clap:

/thread
 
If images of them are posted online, a potential employer may see 'em. Not necessarily a deal breaker though.

Oh no, he accidentally saw those images? Poor thing. I totally sympathise.
 
Isn't it obvious that you should be careful of what you post? :p
 
Don't log on to snoop other people's twitter and facebook page and it won't be an issue during the interview?

Just guessing...

Anyone can search your on-line profile & have a record of who you have looked at? I'm shocked! You make your personal life public & all of the sudden...Your personal life is public. Stunning.
 
I wonder if it will become acceptable for employers to demand facebook-esque disclosure of personal life from potential employees in the future. It certainly looks possible, if this practice isn't stamped out soon.
 
Back
Top Bottom