Hygro
soundcloud.com/hygro/
In my experience as someone whose path by great luck led me to understand fiscal economics at a high and comprehensive level, I have noticed some things about the quality of takes about my field.
While learning it, even before I got good, I discovered that the news is wrong. It got hard to read media takes, even in prestigious newspapers with economics credentialed writers, because they were wrong. Fake news. News in service of bought interests etc.
But ... the news was way more right than the un-credentialed skeptical masses who were already saying the news is wrong and not to trust it.
Think about that a second. A dumbass who doesn't know anything and then follows the first authoritative but wrong source was more right than the correctly skeptical but still dumbass.'
The good news is, while the economic takes in the news are more less incorrect, they kind of sum out to good enough. Better than our politics to begin with.
And it was turtles everywhere. The higher level, economics within universities, overall good enough, better than the news, but a lot of fake/bought/bad takes/uncritical thinking. So you keep going and you level up.
It's wrong takes all the way down. But if you're at the bottom, your wrong take is probably, very probably a much wronger take than the credentialed person who you know is wrong, one step above you in the pursuit of a topic.
And that's just once slice. FIGHT!
While learning it, even before I got good, I discovered that the news is wrong. It got hard to read media takes, even in prestigious newspapers with economics credentialed writers, because they were wrong. Fake news. News in service of bought interests etc.
But ... the news was way more right than the un-credentialed skeptical masses who were already saying the news is wrong and not to trust it.
Think about that a second. A dumbass who doesn't know anything and then follows the first authoritative but wrong source was more right than the correctly skeptical but still dumbass.'
The good news is, while the economic takes in the news are more less incorrect, they kind of sum out to good enough. Better than our politics to begin with.
And it was turtles everywhere. The higher level, economics within universities, overall good enough, better than the news, but a lot of fake/bought/bad takes/uncritical thinking. So you keep going and you level up.
It's wrong takes all the way down. But if you're at the bottom, your wrong take is probably, very probably a much wronger take than the credentialed person who you know is wrong, one step above you in the pursuit of a topic.
And that's just once slice. FIGHT!
