Oh cool, a strawman.Why someone who thinks that white supremacy in America is a real issue must also support giving toddlers puberty-blockers is beyond me.
Oh cool, a strawman.Why someone who thinks that white supremacy in America is a real issue must also support giving toddlers puberty-blockers is beyond me.
Why someone who thinks that white supremacy in America is a real issue must also support giving toddlers puberty-blockers is beyond me. It's not as if Scientologists and Mormons all had a single party line (do I miss the days when America's crazies weren't marching in alliance against everyone else).
Tom Ridge said:From my point of view, [DHS] wasn’t designed to become the president’s personal militia and so [their involvement in the unrest in Portland] is somewhat troubling
A Republican, fwiw.Tom Ridge said:[If I were still Governor] I welcome the opportunity to work with any federal agency to reduce crime or lawlessness in the cities, but it would be a cold day in Hell before I would consent to an uninvited, unilateral intervention into one of my cities
Why someone who thinks that white supremacy in America is a real issue must also support giving toddlers puberty-blockers is beyond me. It's not as if Scientologists and Mormons all had a single party line (do I miss the days when America's crazies weren't marching in alliance against everyone else).
EDIT: Note to mods, I am not claiming that supporting LGBTQ means you support giving toddlers puberty-blockers, only that it's an LGBTQ-related issue and some of their supporters want it.
Oh cool, a strawman.
This is a new low for you.
What the **** are you talking about
1. Nothing about that indicates puberty blockers.There's a very young trans kid being promoted by Netflix right now so please stop playing innocent.
More I found with a quick search:
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/charlize-theron-daughter-jackson-transgender
https://nypost.com/2019/10/23/texas...ng-to-stop-7-year-old-sons-gender-transition/
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/allowing-a-three-year-old-to-be-transgender-is-insane
There's a very young trans kid being promoted by Netflix right now so please stop playing innocent.
More I found with a quick search:
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/charlize-theron-daughter-jackson-transgender
https://nypost.com/2019/10/23/texas...ng-to-stop-7-year-old-sons-gender-transition/
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/allowing-a-three-year-old-to-be-transgender-is-insane
This isn't about solidarity.
Are you talking about BLM? (Sorry, I haven't been keeping up with this thread.) I was listening to a radio program about folks in Ashtabula County, in Ohio, and it wasn't specifically about the demonstrations, but the subject came up, and a White woman mentioned that BLM raises her hackles because "Black Lives Matter" implies to her that other lives don't matter. That is, she understood it to mean - and continues to insist on understanding it to mean - that "Only Black Lives Matter." I'm genuinely astonished that people hear it that way; I immediately understood it to mean "Black Lives Matter Too." It didn't even occur to me to hear it the other way until someone explained to me what the resistance to it was about. I've never heard anyone in, or supportive of, that movement tell me that I've misunderstood their intent. I only ever hear it from people who resist or reject the message.That wasn't my question though, unless you think it's 0%?
Anyway, I agree that the name of the movement is disorienting and actually requires conversation. The weirdest part is that about 40% of people just got it within the first couple paragraphs of that conversation. And about 30% of people seem incapable
Are you talking about BLM? (Sorry, I haven't been keeping up with this thread.) I was listening to a radio program about folks in Ashtabula County, in Ohio, and it wasn't specifically about the demonstrations, but the subject came up, and a White woman mentioned that BLM raises her hackles because "Black Lives Matter" implies to her that other lives don't matter. That is, she understood it to mean - and continues to insist on understanding it to mean - that "Only Black Lives Matter." I'm genuinely astonished that people hear it that way; I immediately understood it to mean "Black Lives Matter Too." It didn't even occur to me to hear it the other way until someone explained to me what the resistance to it was about. I've never heard anyone in, or supportive of, that movement tell me that I've misunderstood their intent. I only ever hear it from people who resist or reject the message.
1. Nothing about that indicates puberty blockers.
2. Not a toddler. No mention of puberty blockers.
3. Not a toddler. As of date of article, not on puberty blockers.
4. Nothing about puberty blockers. A single mention about "hormone blockers", but not related to any actual thing. Opinion piece, and the original MSN link appears to be dead.
This is of course completely bypassing the actual debate about the use of puberty blockers, which is better-saved for another thread regardless. I'm simply pointing out your use of a strawman (and apparently your very poor use of Google).
That wasn't my question though, unless you think it's 0%?
Anyway, I agree that the name of the movement is disorienting and actually requires conversation. The weirdest part is that about 40% of people just got it within the first couple paragraphs of that conversation. And about 30% of people seem incapable
Racists will think of any excuse to hate on a movement like that. This is so transparent.. These people don't complain that "Save the rainforest" doesn't include allll the forests.
I didn't mean literally giving them puberty-blockers (what would the point be?), I was just referring to the general way in which very young children are now being encouraged/groomed into becoming trans for dubious reasons.
All sides of the aisle already accepted that black lives matter. It's hard to resist the slogan during these riots because the killing was so obviously unjust, but the specific incidents that BLM has gone after in the past were pretty controversial. Imagine someone telling you that not specifically supporting the conviction of a police officer or implementing a new policy means that you "don't think [put a group here] deserves to live at all".
My analogy works well enough. Just because you want to focus on some specific cause does not mean that you don't care about any other cause.
bolding mine, for this reason: this study studied transgender adults, 95% of them would have been older than 'very young' back in 1995, and was released in 2010.
Young children are and have been trans, nobody's "grooming" them, you sound identical to an LGBT-pedohysteric saying the gay agenda is to recruit kids
Imagine someone telling you that they didn't support the conviction of a concentration camp guard, but they're definitely not anti-semitic. It would be unbelievable, right?

Are you talking about BLM? (Sorry, I haven't been keeping up with this thread.) I was listening to a radio program about folks in Ashtabula County, in Ohio, and it wasn't specifically about the demonstrations, but the subject came up, and a White woman mentioned that BLM raises her hackles because "Black Lives Matter" implies to her that other lives don't matter. That is, she understood it to mean - and continues to insist on understanding it to mean - that "Only Black Lives Matter." I'm genuinely astonished that people hear it that way; I immediately understood it to mean "Black Lives Matter Too." It didn't even occur to me to hear it the other way until someone explained to me what the resistance to it was about. I've never heard anyone in, or supportive of, that movement tell me that I've misunderstood their intent. I only ever hear it from people who resist or reject the message.
I really don't think they're misunderstanding. They just dislike that equality might be coming. They enjoy being on top