Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Hrothbern, Mar 22, 2019.
You got me
Except I wouldnt keep my euromonies in a Greek bank, like all good Greeks, keep their euromonies are all stored in highly reputable and efficient Swiss bank.
Switzerland is also known for its health, wellbeing and rejuvenation resorts. The fresh mountain air already since the 19th century attracting people to recover. Did that not start with the British elite ?
The fresh sea air of the Aegean islands just as good, in a comfortable climate, with nice food.
Health is a booming economy in all its aspects with our ageing population.
Cities that actually made bids to host either agency.
The EU has around 50 agencies and that number is likely to grow (also because the amount of members increased ?)
In the link the interactive map of the screenshot below, showing not all 50. There are also agencies that are more appendices to functions in Brussels.
edit The UK had only one. Was that influenced by 40 years UK Euro-scepticism ?
Greece BTW two... with one in Kyr's city, fitting the relatively high amount of Engineering students in Greece (snatched away from the Zjermans that have the biggest and deepest apprentice system of all EU members)
I know that Americans all the time confuse the staff of Mercury and Asclepius, but to see the same thing on an EU map is DEEPLY disappointing. I had expected more from them.
Maybe it isn't a mistake and just refers to satanism ^_^
A better question is how kerukeion morphed into caduceus. Ceruceum would be a logical evolution, but caduceus?
Caduceus sounds latin anyway. I will look it up, but there is little chance it ties to a greek term.
edit: a fast search didn't provide anything useful. Seems to have somehow morphed into caduceus, after first being latinized as cādūceum. The "a" is easier to explain, though, given in doric greek you often find "a" replacing ionian "e". So κήρυξ becomes κάρυξ, i assume.
The term generally meant a staff used by a messenger/similar (kerux). Not sure if the staff of Hermes had (just) the general name "kerukeion", but articles note that "caduceus" was only used to refer to Hermes' staff.
Liam Fox, Britain's trade secretary, during a visit in Iraq, said the EU will end up with 50 “disruptive and resentful” British members of the European Parliament if the U.K. takes part in next month's EU election.
Well.. the UK as a whole will get 73 seats.
And if the polls so far are correct, the Farrage Brexit party and the UKIP get together 30% of the popular vote, which could be a bit more than 30% of the seats because of the rules in the UK how to convert that PV in seats.
So... let's say 25 disruptive seats.
Where is Liam Fox seeing those other 25 seats coming from ???
Not from the Tories. In total they get from the polls 12 seats and among them europhile Remainers.
So where from then ? From Labour, from the Greens, from the LibDems, from the SNP, Cymru ???
In other words: BS from mr Liam Fox as usual.
He is BTW in Iraq, that former UK mandatory protectorate, to work on a trade deal. A kind of funny one.
The UK exports roughly GBP 350 Million per year, or 0.35 Billion, to Iraq.
Fox is talking now with Iraq on a 1.0 Billion aid to Iraq, not because of that 2003 war, but to help companies like Siemens and GE, their UK plants, to export more.
Yeah... that will really help the UK economy !
I have the suspicion that if someone was to plot a graph of:
x axis: British government ministrial visits to foreign countries
y:axis: increase in exports five to ten years subsequent to each minister's visit
over the last 100 years; it would, with the possible exception
of the subsidised arnaments industry, show a negative correlation.
I.e. ordinary (rather than gvernmental) British trade
prospers best when there were few or no ministerial visits.
Hmmm yes, in general that seems to be the best support for Traitorfish's anarchist positions: the fact that whenever the British government intervenes, they tend to to more harm than good, if they do any good, that is.
Well I read it, the article is tiresome and I really don't recommend it.
It seems the conservatives are bogged down by their own procedures.
The only consolation was in some of the comments on it there.
I still have Phil Hammond as my prediction for next UK PM.
Wouldn't that be pretty much a continuation of May?
Surely David David David has more support within the party?
It should say ‘no fewer than sixty-five Constituency Association Chairmen’. /baron Kyr.
Of course, it's the will of the people in her sconstituency that she be their MP so she's not stepping down.
The government can act when it wants to, e.g. arresting the odd few hundred or thousand environmental activists, but that might be because a caertain Ms. Thunberg that Brexit is an excellent excuse to not discuss climate change legislation.
Also, the baron should start reading the Grauniad again:
Does Tony Blair have no self-awareness? He needs to stop talking now
I would say Hammond lacks personality and charisma but that never stopped John Major.
same thought !
And so far he did well in keeping the business and corporate community positive on the likely outcome: no panick reactions in the direct wake of the referendum. Only the inevtable inflation effects of the lower Pound, and ofc business stalling expansive investments.
He released just enough govt money to keep the engine running of the economy.
And although the lower investment rate is bad for increasing productivity rate, it does help lowering unemployment rate when there is no panic in population consumption and business orders on operational level. Higher GDP at identical productivity is more jobs, and newspapers singing halleluja.
He did quite well actually.
Hammond imho doesn't have that much of a John Major vibe. JM at least seemed to believe in what he was saying, and did come across as decent - though one should not forget he was fully in line with US in the first gulf war, so it's not like he was some champion of actual humanism.
Btw, what is that i saw on youtube on a possible move by tory mps to oust Bercow?
My own view on Bercow - the house speaker- has been stated a few times. He used to be a figure i liked, but i think he is not at all helping with his rather more than just entirely blatant pro-remain stance. Cause he isn't (while speaker) an mp - he is the speaker by role, and should not use his role to make policy but to allow the house to make policy.
Just ask Edwina… and no, I don't mean the knitting hen from Chicken Run.
Separate names with a comma.