Unfortunately, I understand only too well.
The last twelve pages of thread say otherwise.
I don't think I have an argument here. However, quite a few, including yourself, resorted to the most infantile trolling imaginable when I refused to justify it. It seems like you're telling yourself, rather than me, the importance of this point.
We never asked you to justify it, you insisted that WE should justify it! When you make such gross juxtapositions of fact I can't help but wonder if you're doing this on purpose.
More unwarranted condescention. Don't let me stand in your way while proving yourself an ass.
Oh don't worry, if I'm mine is a gentle rapids, yours is Victoria Falls.
I simply can't imagine what your prattle is all about. First you make an unwarranted accusation of trolling...only to dive into pure troll behavior,
I wasn't aware they were mutually exclusive, acusing someone of trolling and then trolling yourself. It may be a case of the pot calling the kettle black, but that doesn't mean the pot is wrong.
and even with the assistance of fellow jackasses lack the courage to back your claim. Wow.
Which claim would that be, then? The claim that I think Bush is a good guy? If that's the one you're talking about, then your reading comprehension skills are in far more need of help than I thought, because you just said the opposite earlier in this very post, and agreed that justification of our opinions about Bush's character are uneeded.
However, if you're referring to my claim that you're a troll, then you quite simply don't know what a troll is. If you did, you'd see that your posts are "simply self-evident," to borrow a quote from you.
Now this is a good point. Judging from your hysterical behavior, I'm actually surprised you have heard this before.
Experience, pal. And advice you don't seem to be following very well.
